Jonathan Sillito wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Leopold Toetsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And from imcc's register allocations POV the whole coroutine stuff is a
PITA, no registers are preserved, AFAIK, so a coroutines and the caller
+ all edges out from both do share the same registers,
> -Original Message-
> From: Leopold Toetsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Does a couroutine end? And how?
> The current implementation jumps forth and back by the B opcode,
> one is a "call coroutine" the other is a "yield". There seems to be no
> possibility, that the coroutine states, "I
Does a couroutine end? And how?
The current implementation jumps forth and back by the B opcode,
one is a "call coroutine" the other is a "yield". There seems to be no
possibility, that the coroutine states, "I'm finished now" - with
possibly meaning "don't call me again".
And from imcc's regis
