Re: is it required to use type declarations?

2002-12-18 Thread Dave Storrs
Attribution lists are getting a bit complex. This is in response to what Piers wrote on Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:50:44PM +. DKS > > [specifying types] > > Hm. I'm way short on sleep today, so I'm probably missing something, > > but I don't see why Perl can't sort this out without a specific

Re: is it required to use type declarations?

2002-12-18 Thread Piers Cawley
Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 09:31:41AM +, Piers Cawley wrote: >> Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > It seems like Perl6 is moving farther and farther away from Perl5's >> > (almost) typelessness. >> >> It depends what you mean by typed. Perl h

Re: is it required to use type declarations?

2002-12-18 Thread Dave Storrs
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 09:31:41AM +, Piers Cawley wrote: > Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It seems like Perl6 is moving farther and farther away from Perl5's > > (almost) typelessness. > > It depends what you mean by typed. Perl has always had strongly typed > *values* (which s

Re: is it required to use type declarations?

2002-12-18 Thread Piers Cawley
Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:58:54PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: >> > From: Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > My understanding was that in Perl6, you could use pretty much anything >> > for a hashkey--string, number, object, whatever, and that it did not >>

Re: is it required to use type declarations? (was Re: 'hashkey context/Str context')

2002-12-12 Thread Dave Storrs
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:13:49PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: > [Dks wrote:] > > So...are we intending that types and type safety will be like 'use > > strict' (optional and only on request), or will they be like sigils > > (mandatory, can't be turned off)? Or, perhaps, on by default but able > >

Re: is it required to use type declarations? (was Re: 'hashkey context/Str context')

2002-12-11 Thread Luke Palmer
> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:04:46 -0800 > From: Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:58:54PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: > > > From: Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > My understanding was that in Perl6, you could use pretty much anything > > > for a hashkey--string, num

is it required to use type declarations? (was Re: 'hashkey context/Str context')

2002-12-11 Thread Dave Storrs
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:58:54PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: > > From: Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > My understanding was that in Perl6, you could use pretty much anything > > for a hashkey--string, number, object, whatever, and that it did not > > get mashed down into a string. Did I have t