On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 04:41:30PM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Supposed I define
>
> regex digit { [0..9] }
>
> what is the negative?
You need to be careful about what you mean here by "negative". If you mean
"match
a single character that is not in the list", then it is as Patrick said.
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:42:16PM -0500, Chas. Owens wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:12, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> snip
> > Also, Perl 6 already provides a 'digit' rule by default, although
> > it's digits in the Unicode sense as opposed to simply the 0..9
> > sequence.
> snip
>
> Please te
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:12, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
snip
> Also, Perl 6 already provides a 'digit' rule by default, although
> it's digits in the Unicode sense as opposed to simply the 0..9
> sequence.
snip
Please tell me that Perl 6 isn't going to make that same error the
Perl 5.8 did. Or a
