Re: Does parrot_assembly.pod need an update?

2003-12-24 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looking more closely at 'parrot_assembly.pod' I started to find more > discrepancies between the documentation in 'ops/*.pod' and > 'parrot_assembly.pod'. This document and docs/pdds/pdd06_pasm.

Does parrot_assembly.pod need an update?

2003-12-24 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer
Hi, I was trying to track down a core dump in 'examples/assembly/pcre.imc'. Looking at the code in 'library/pcre.imc' and the documentation in 'parrot_assembly.pod' I found that 'store_globals' was misdocumented. The two parameters were interchanged. Look

parrot_assembly.pod

2003-10-09 Thread Michael Scott
docs/parrot_assembly.pod is just an earlier version of PDD 6. An empowered person should remove it. Mike

Re: [perl #17907] [PATCH docs/parrot_assembly.pod] Minor typos and consistencies

2002-10-16 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:31:53AM +, chromatic wrote: > I've been browsing the docs, and took the time to do a bit of copyediting. > There's room for more consistency -- sometimes the registers are called 'X' > and 'Y' and other times 'x' and 'y'. Yes, I did notice this. Is there any sor

[perl #17907] [PATCH docs/parrot_assembly.pod] Minor typos and consistencies

2002-10-13 Thread via RT
- url: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/attach/39768/32196/db6a98/assembly.patch --- parrot_assembly.pod~ Sun Oct 13 19:04:11 2002 +++ parrot_assembly.pod Sun Oct 13 19:18:05 2002 @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ =head2 Data manipulation -These ops handle manipulating the data in registers

Re: parrot_assembly.pod

2001-12-19 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Alex Gough wrote: > Much of parrot_assembly.pod seems out of date, or raises interesting > questions: > > Are we going to bother with NAMESPACEs and SUBs in assembler? Yup. We just haven't gotten there yet. > Is it worth keeping documentation for (imp

parrot_assembly.pod

2001-12-19 Thread Alex Gough
Much of parrot_assembly.pod seems out of date, or raises interesting questions: Are we going to bother with NAMESPACEs and SUBs in assembler? (from parrot_assembly.pod: Namespaces are noted with the NAMESPACE directive. It takes a single parameter, the name of the namespace. Multilevel