HaloO,
On Thursday, 22. October 2009 20:58:15 I wrote:
> The class Dogwood however might be written as
>
>class Dogwood does Dog[Dogwood:] does Wood[Dogwood:]
>{
>method Dog {...}
>method Wood {...}
>method bark {...}
>}
On #perl there was the question if any t
HaloO,
On Thursday, 22. October 2009 18:31:16 I wrote:
> The invocant slot of the role signature is sort of implied in the spec
> already! I also like this because a type in Perl 6 is then always
> written as SomeRole[SomeClass:]. Classes without explicit roles are
> Any[SomeClass:] and untyped is
