Vladimir Lipskiy wrote:
The current implementation of find_lex (by_name) is suboptimal. A linear
scan over the list of lexical names is performed
(s. sub.c:lexicals_get_position()).
A better way would be to provide a list of lexicals plus a name hash,
where hash values are indices into the list.
The current implementation of find_lex (by_name) is suboptimal. A linear
scan over the list of lexical names is performed
(s. sub.c:lexicals_get_position()).
A better way would be to provide a list of lexicals plus a name hash,
where hash values are indices into the list.
What would be a
The current implementation of find_lex (by_name) is suboptimal. A linear
scan over the list of lexical names is performed
(s. sub.c:lexicals_get_position()).
A better way would be to provide a list of lexicals plus a name hash,
where hash values are indices into the list.
As such a
Leo~
Why not just use a hash and ditch the array then?
Matt
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
The current implementation of find_lex (by_name) is suboptimal. A linear
scan over the list of lexical names is performed
(s. sub.c:lexicals_get_position()).
A better way would be to provide a list of lexicals
Matt Fowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo~
Why not just use a hash and ditch the array then?
Because $HL may emit code to access lexicals by numeric index.
Matt
leo
