Hello,
Another new test. This one just tests that basic anon subs and blocks
work correctly. Nothing all that special really, just 3 simple tests.
Again, if there are any issues, let me know.
Thanks,
- Stevan
anon_block.t
Description: Binary data
Hello all,
I have attached a patch for t/op/join.t, it adds 2 failing (TODO) tests
and 3 passing tests (for a total of 6). It attempts to cover all of the
basic variants of using join().
Let me know if there is any issues.
Thanks,
- Stevan
t_op_join.patch
Description: Binary data
Attached is a patch for t/op/not.t. This is a nearly direct port of the
t/op/not.t in bleadperl. Missing though is a comparison against a
boolianized undef, which I don't know if it exists in Perl 6 or not.
Enjoy!
Steve Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- /dev/null 2005-02-19 03:47:20.626125536 -0
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-02-08 through 2005-02-22
All~
Welcome to yet another fortnight summary. Lately p6l has been out
stripping p6i in volume. While this used to be the norm, lately it has
become a rare occurrence. Strange... Anyway, this summary would be
brought to you buy c
Hello all & Autrijus,
I managed to get some time today to hack out some tests for PUGS. The
attached file contains a number of test for 'for'.
I based these test on what I read in the Exegesis 4
(http://www.perl.com/lpt/a/2002/04/01/exegesis4.html) about how 'for'
should work. A number of the t
This patch adds a test to t/06sub.t to check that a closure returned by
a subroutine can find the variable that it is closed on.
But in writing this test I found that "if (die 'foo') { }" doesn't die, so a
test for that has been added to t/base/if.t.
And finally "my $foo; eval '$foo = die "bool"'
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 04:17:53PM +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> Here's a patch to add this. It's heavily cargo-culted, I need to read
> some docs about haskell some day. As I wasn't able to get FiniteMaps to
> work I implemented my own kludgy function to flatten pairs for the hash.
> Also I
Autrijus Tang wrote:
> jn Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:54:26AM -, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> > I had this silly idea, to try to add %ENV to pugs. That would be an
> > interesting exercise. So I can write CGI scripts. Maybe. But I don't
> > know what's the Right way to do it in Perl 6. Any hints ?
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:05:34PM -0600, Steve Peters wrote:
> I was hoping I had a bit more time tonight to work on tests, but house-hacking
> projects took precedence. Attached is a patch to t/op/pair.t to add some
> additional tests to make sure values of numbers and pairs can be handled as
>
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 06:51:24AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> This might initially work for read-only access/testing, but in
> the long run I suspect that %*ENV will be tied directly to the
> C putenv/getenv calls or their Parrot/other equivalents.
> Assigning to %*ENV should change the e
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 08:35:49PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> jn Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:54:26AM -, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> > I had this silly idea, to try to add %ENV to pugs. That would be an
> > interesting exercise. So I can write CGI scripts. Maybe. But I don't
> > know what's the
jn Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:54:26AM -, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> I had this silly idea, to try to add %ENV to pugs. That would be an
> interesting exercise. So I can write CGI scripts. Maybe. But I don't
> know what's the Right way to do it in Perl 6. Any hints ?
In Perl6 I think you do it
Hi all,
I was hoping I had a bit more time tonight to work on tests, but house-hacking
projects took precedence. Attached is a patch to t/op/pair.t to add some
additional tests to make sure values of numbers and pairs can be handled as
well as using a pair as a key for a pair.
The test script a
I had this silly idea, to try to add %ENV to pugs. That would be an
interesting exercise. So I can write CGI scripts. Maybe. But I don't
know what's the Right way to do it in Perl 6. Any hints ?
--
#!/usr/bin/pugs
say "Just another Pugs hacker";
14 matches
Mail list logo