[perl #61988] "$.foo" doesn't accept args

2009-01-05 Thread Dave Whipp
# New Ticket Created by "Dave Whipp" # Please include the string: [perl #61988] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61988 > rakudo: class A { method foo { say @_ }; method bar { $.foo(42) } }; A.bar raku

Re: [perl #61990] [BUG] setset .WHAT returns incorrect value

2009-01-05 Thread Jonathan Worthington
publiustemp-perl6interna...@yahoo.com (via RT) wrote: For r35004: subset Even of Int where { not $_ % 2 }; my Even $num = 2; say $num; say $num.WHAT; Output: 2 Int I'm expecting: 2 Even I think the current behaviour is correct (or at least, implemented to match my und

[perl #61990] [BUG] setset .WHAT returns incorrect value

2009-01-05 Thread publiustemp-perl6interna...@yahoo.com (via RT)
# New Ticket Created by publiustemp-perl6interna...@yahoo.com # Please include the string: [perl #61990] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61990 > For r35004: subset Even of Int where { not $_ % 2 }; my Ev

[perl #61982] [BUG] is rw/copy traits causes assignment/binding confusion

2009-01-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz # Please include the string: [perl #61982] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61982 > Rakudo r34428 sub example ($x is rw) { $x = 3; my @a; @a.push($x); $x =

[perl #61978] [TODO] Rakudo needs a .does method in Object

2009-01-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz # Please include the string: [perl #61978] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61978 > Rakudo r34428: ./perl6 -e '1.does(Int)' Method 'does' not found for invocant of class 'I

[perl #61980] [BUG] French quote hyper operators don't work with -e one liners

2009-01-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz # Please include the string: [perl #61980] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61980 > Rakudo r34428: $ echo 'say <1 2> »+« <1 1>' > test.t $ ./perl6 test.t 23 $ ./perl6 -e 's

Re: [perl #61840] [TODO] min= and max= operators

2009-01-05 Thread Moritz Lenz
Carl MXXsak (via RT) wrote: > # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" > # Please include the string: [perl #61840] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61840 > > > > Rakudo r34628 doesn't support the assignment m

Re: [perl #61838] Rakudo allows reference to variables before their declaration

2009-01-05 Thread Moritz Lenz
Carl MXXsak (via RT) wrote: > # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" > # Please include the string: [perl #61838] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61838 > > > > Rakudo r34628: > > $ perl6 -e 'my $a = $b' >

Re: [perl #61836] Rakudo cannot take the minimum of undef

2009-01-05 Thread Moritz Lenz
Carl MXXsak (via RT) wrote: > # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" > # Please include the string: [perl #61836] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61836 > > > > Rakudo r34628: > > $ perl6 -e 'undef min 2' >

Re: [perl #61920] [PATCH] test division in 02-op-math.t

2009-01-05 Thread Moritz Lenz
Kyle Hasselbacher (via RT) wrote: > # New Ticket Created by "Kyle Hasselbacher" > # Please include the string: [perl #61920] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61920 > > > > I didn't see division in with the

Re: [perl #61928] [BUG] (undef === undef)

2009-01-05 Thread Moritz Lenz
Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:52:45PM -0800, Todd Hepler wrote: >> I think this is a bug, but I'm not sure. >> >> (undef === undef) currently evaluates to false. Seem like it should be >> true. >> >> I couldn't find a test for it, so below is a patch to add one. > > Be