Sorry, probably not anymore.
I'm making an effort to go through the queue and keep things up to date,
hopefully new
patches won't languish like this one.
Thanks for the patch, and please try out Rakudo * tomorrow.
On Wed Jul 28 17:17:34 2010, r...@hoelz.ro wrote:
> I submitted these patches ov
I submitted these patches over a year ago...are they even relevant
anymore?
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:51:12 -0700
"Will Coleda via RT" wrote:
> On Sat Jul 25 17:20:40 2009, hoelzro wrote:
> > See the patches' summaries for details.
>
> Sorry for the delay in responding, but these patches no longer
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 19:09, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Patrick R. Michaud
> wrote:
>
> > I said a bit more about it as well: I think we should just eliminate
> > the pod from the README file altogether, and leave it as plain text.
>
Ah, well, since that was what
On Wed Nov 25 15:16:33 2009, masak wrote:
> $ cat test.p6
> my $var;
> my $var
>
> $ perl6 --target=pir --output=test.pir test.p6
> Redeclaration of variable $var
>
> $ cat test.pir
> 1
>
> $ perl6 --target=past test.p6
> Redeclaration of variable $var
> "past" => 1
>
> masak pasted "jnthn: ev
On Fri Sep 04 00:06:21 2009, equinox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I converted this into pir...using rakudo-2009-07.
>
> my $p=0;
> my $str=" a a b ";
>
> while (substr($str,$p)~~/(a)|(b)/) #~~ is instread of =~
> {
> print "match found at $p>>{$0 // "not found"}<< or >>{$2 // "not
> found"}<<\n"; #
On Thu Jun 17 05:47:40 2010, q...@cono.org.ua wrote:
> 15:37 <@jnthn> rakudo: ("62.76.96.200", "62.76.96.201", "62.76.96.202"
> ... "62.76.96.223").perl.say
> 15:37 <+p6eval> rakudo cb0e95: OUTPUT«("62.76.96.200", "62.76.96.201",
> "62.76.96.202")»
> 15:37 <@jnthn> rakudo: ("62.76.96.200", "62.76.
On Thu Jun 17 05:47:40 2010, q...@cono.org.ua wrote:
> 15:37 <@jnthn> rakudo: ("62.76.96.200", "62.76.96.201", "62.76.96.202"
> ... "62.76.96.223").perl.say
> 15:37 <+p6eval> rakudo cb0e95: OUTPUT«("62.76.96.200", "62.76.96.201",
> "62.76.96.202")»
> 15:37 <@jnthn> rakudo: ("62.76.96.200", "62.76.
On Sat Sep 26 10:56:40 2009, dolmen wrote:
> Evaluation of $*OUT.&printf does not gives a result consistent with
> $*OUT.&say
>
> rakudo: say $*OUT.&printf.WHAT;
> rakudo e33d20: OUTPUT«elements() not implemented in class
> 'Sub'in Main (/tmp/iPwK5u8ApO:0)»
>
> rakudo: say $*OUT.&say.WHAT;
>
On Sat Sep 26 10:56:40 2009, dolmen wrote:
> Evaluation of $*OUT.&printf does not gives a result consistent with
> $*OUT.&say
>
> rakudo: say $*OUT.&printf.WHAT;
> rakudo e33d20: OUTPUT«elements() not implemented in class
> 'Sub'in Main (/tmp/iPwK5u8ApO:0)»
>
> rakudo: say $*OUT.&say.WHAT;
>
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 08:11:40PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:29:42 -0700, "Moritz Lenz via RT"
>> said:
>>
>> > Thank you for your patch.
>> > I know I promised to apply it, but pmichaud++, our pumpking,
# New Ticket Created by Tadeusz Sośnierz
# Please include the string: [perl #76772]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=76772 >
Here's a patch adding an interface to Parrot's stat Opcode in Rakudo.
I've consulted
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Will Coleda via RT
wrote:
>
> +1 on this patch (at least in spirit) from me, but I cannot apply it
> (probably because it was
> inlined in the ticket.) Can you add it as an attachment?
>
> Thanks!
in attachment
--
Varyanick I. Alex
icq: 102 575 440
skype: cono.
> new error:
>
> > my $a = 'abc'; say $a[1];
> ===SORRY!===
> .[1] out of range for type Str()
>
I believe this is the correct behavior per the specification.
Pm
On Wed Jul 28 09:46:16 2010, pmichaud wrote:
> The spec changed to use $*VM, and Rakudo now implements that.
>
> > say $*VM
> /home/pmichaud/rakudo/parrot_install/bin
> >
>
> Pm
Looks like t/spec has not yet caught up - leaving with moritz++ for
spectests.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 08:11:40PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:29:42 -0700, "Moritz Lenz via RT"
> said:
>
> > Thank you for your patch.
> > I know I promised to apply it, but pmichaud++, our pumpking, spoke out
> > against it, indicating that having now file named REA
The spec changed to use $*VM, and Rakudo now implements that.
> say $*VM
/home/pmichaud/rakudo/parrot_install/bin
>
Pm
On Thu Nov 19 02:41:01 2009, sco...@dd.com.au wrote:
> Picked up a compile time problem with Rakudo today. It is actually
>Parrot that uses perl5 to calculate which libraries and headers to
>use, and it was using invalid/old entries between an OS upgrade on
>Mac OS X. This was fixed by
On Wed Sep 16 14:53:40 2009, masak wrote:
> $ perl6 -e 'my $a = 0; loop while $a < 10 { say $a++ }'
> Confused at line 1, near "{ say $a++"
> [...]
>
> I think the desired syntax is 'repeat while', not 'loop while'. The
> compiler could give a hint to that effect. Ditto 'loop until'.
Now gives th
On Sun Aug 16 05:49:20 2009, masak wrote:
> rakudo: role Maybe[::T] { role Just[T] {} }; say
Maybe[Int].new()
> rakudo 0d4fe0: OUTPUT«Potential internal error: bindability
> check may have done more than just binding. [...]
This no longer generates an error, but the followup that the OP says
s
On Fri Jul 24 02:41:50 2009, masak wrote:
> rakudo: sub foo(:$bar) { say $bar }; class A { has $.bar;
> method baz() { foo(:$.bar) } }; A.new(:bar).baz
> rakudo b19862: OUTPUT«Symbol '$1bar' not predeclared in baz
> [...]
> :)
> * masak submits rakudobug
> now, are my expectations right in this
On Sat Mar 06 10:12:34 2010, ml...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
> Rakudo 2d9808d19ba45c09f61a4c6fc4b4b7159ea760cc:
>
> $ cat foo.pl
> my $x;
> so $x = 1;
>
> $ ./perl6 foo.pl
> Cannot assign to readonly value
> current instr.: '&die' pc 16799 (src/builtins/Junction.pir:347)
> called from Sub '&
On Thu Mar 04 14:53:46 2010, masak wrote:
> rakudo: say 1%%1
> rakudo 37e574: OUTPUT«Method 'postcircumfix:<[ ]>' not found
> for invocant of class '' [...]
> ooh!
> * masak submits rakudobug
>
> What's postcircumfix:<[ ]> got to do with it? :)
This now outputs 1, and is covered in S03-metaops
On Mon Feb 15 01:22:09 2010, masak wrote:
> rakudo: say &1
> rakudo 70667a: OUTPUT«Method 'postcircumfix:<[ ]>' not found
> for invocant of class '' [...]
> That one was slightly less than awesome.
> * masak submits rakudobug
Output is now:
rakudo: say &1;
rakudo 2808a5: OUTPUT«Any()»
--
On Wed Sep 16 14:47:06 2009, masak wrote:
> $ perl6 -e 'class A { method foo(%*opts) {} }'
> Invalid twigil used in signature parameter. at line 1, near ") {} }"
>
> Suggest making the error message include "did you mean '*%opts'?".
This doesn't error now:
$ ./perl6 -e 'class A { method foo(%*op
24 matches
Mail list logo
