I'd agree that it is a bug, yes. Well, the reason why it happens might be
justified, but this is probably one of the fattest traps I've seen so far. I
really think we should come up with a way to eliminate this trap somehow. Not
sure how, but there must be a way and I really recommend anybody
That may indeed explain why it works the way it does, but that doesn't
mean it isn't a bug. IMO it certainly is; [X] and [X*] don't work as
advertised.
Let me explain how I found this bug.
I'm generating a list of divisors for a number. I already have the
prime factorization of that number,
That may indeed explain why it works the way it does, but that doesn't
mean it isn't a bug. IMO it certainly is; [X] and [X*] don't work as
advertised.
Let me explain how I found this bug.
I'm generating a list of divisors for a number. I already have the
prime factorization of that number,
I think this is related: https://github.com/perl6/doc/issues/1400
On 2017-07-01 12:25:39, pe...@mscha.org wrote:
> This is OK:
>
> > say [X] ((1,2,3), (4,5,6));
> ((1 4) (1 5) (1 6) (2 4) (2 5) (2 6) (3 4) (3 5) (3 6))
> > say [X*] ((1,2,3), (4,5,6));
> (4 5 6 8 10 12 12 15 18)
>
> ... but this
