That's pretty good. But issues are not closed without tests, unless there's a
good reason not to add a test. No reason was mentioned, therefore reopening
this with “testneeded” tag.
On 2017-07-09 15:49:46, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:57:04 -0700, jn...@jnthn.net
Since when are we rejecting tickets like that? :)
The title says “Strange error”. Current error message is:
===SORRY!===
redo without loop construct
Two things:
1) No line number
2) Even if the line number was there, we don't want the behavior of this to be
changing like crazy. See output on all
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 07:14:03 -0700, coke wrote:
> On Sat Jul 23 20:47:04 2016, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> > Not even sure what causes that, but removing the `redo` avoids the
> > error.
> >
> > $ perl6 -e 'react { whenever supply { emit 42; redo } { .say } }'
> > 42
> > No such method 'CALL-ME' for
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:57:04 -0700, jn...@jnthn.net wrote:
> On Fri Oct 14 16:40:27 2016, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The following code attempts to pipe a large Blob (larger than a
> > pipe's
> > buffer size) through an external command.
> > However, it hangs on the `.in.close` line and never
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:01:40 -0800, r...@bastic.net wrote:
> Indeed :) It was just a simple test case to demonstrate some things to
> ab5tract.
>
> Thanks for your work!
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Timo Paulssen via RT <
> perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > we've
On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 13:25:56 -0800, elizabeth wrote:
>
> > On 8 Mar 2017, at 18:09, jn...@jnthn.net via RT > follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:40:22 -0800, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> >> On Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:24:08 -0800, comdog wrote:
> >>> This is the example from the Tap
