# New Ticket Created by Dan Zwell
# Please include the string: [perl #131972]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131972 >
Version: Rakudo version 2017.08-14-gf097e551b built on MoarVM version
2017.08.1-32-gcd41322e
Untodoed in
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/03e5a5120465622d9e13451b43cdeb03fd2354a7
Untodoed in
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/b60cef93e356908eadc7855f816ec8f77bd03e01#diff-4a0037e48f821303bb0939ba43d6e6cfL291
Untodoed in
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/b60cef93e356908eadc7855f816ec8f77bd03e01#diff-4a0037e48f821303bb0939ba43d6e6cfL264
Unskipped in
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/e7252a2a1281f666f362b621c030f7b75db513ae
Unskipped in
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/5425477851ee07c5489d4647920797fe7ae01e19
Untodoed in
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/e9f0893dc39450be68a0550c451ad1eca7e6f3ab
Untodoed in
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/100f141a2103f8c3194520bea7312ac3dad123c2
Untodoed in
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/e9f0893dc39450be68a0550c451ad1eca7e6f3ab
# New Ticket Created by J . David Lowe
# Please include the string: [perl #131985]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131985 >
This short program behaves strangely on my system:
```
#!/usr/bin/env perl6
use v6.c;
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:11:13 -0800, raiph wrote:
> Golf'd to:
>
> role A { method m {} }
> role B does A {}
> class C does A does B {}
>
> Method 'm' must be resolved by class C because it exists in multiple roles
> (A, B)
>
> Note that the same issue leads also to:
>
> role A { has $a }
> role
This was untodo-ed in
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/e180d46b926aaa0b781b1fe5d1ee66d32a666d23
This was untodo-ed in
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/e180d46b926aaa0b781b1fe5d1ee66d32a666d23
We no longer seem to care about “is cached”, so… I don't think we should reject
this (because it may be a nice test case once we start supporting cached
trait), but at the same time this ticket is kinda useless.
On 2014-06-01 03:12:32, elizabeth wrote:
> On 01 Jun 2014, at 12:07, Elizabeth Mattijs
Yea, it is a feature request. And I'd say a very reasonable one.
On 2012-08-07 14:43:12, moritz wrote:
> I'm a bit confused about what to do with an RFC bug. Close it, because
> no patch was forthcoming? Regard it as a feature request?
Currently it says this:
Use of uninitialized value of type Any in numeric context
in block at line 1
As well as complains about sink context in non-repl:
Useless use of "**" in expression "$_**2" in sink context (line 1)
I see no problem with it. Except that it no longer says which variable cau
Still not 77.
On 2012-12-07 02:55:44, masak wrote:
> rn: sub postfix:<+>($a) is looser(&infix:<+>) { $a; 77 }; say
> +6+ +8+
> rakudo 53daef: OUTPUT«83»
> ..niecza v24-5-g599cbcb: OUTPUT«77»
> hah!
> :D
> masak wins
> * masak submits rakudobug
> should be 77
> then Niecza is right.
> in
# New Ticket Created by J . David Lowe
# Please include the string: [perl #131983]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131983 >
This short program behaves dies on my system, apparently because the mixed-in
attribut
# New Ticket Created by Sam S.
# Please include the string: [perl #131981]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131981 >
These should both pass:
my @a = ["a", ["b", "c"]];
is-deeply @a[1; 0], "b", 'mu
I sent a pull request which fixes this bug:
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/pull/1139
I sent a pull request which fixes this bug:
https://github.com/perl6/nqp/pull/368
Please review.
Request for test cases now roast issue:
https://github.com/perl6/roast/issues/297
Planning to close this ticket soon if no objection.
I sent a pull request to nqp that fixes this, please review:
https://github.com/perl6/nqp/pull/368
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 05:53:36 -0700, coke wrote:
> At this stage, something's presence in one of the SYN doesn't mandate
> that it needs to be present in rakudo.
I'd say this particular issue is pre
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 10:03:52 -0700, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> Based on S05, these test-cases should all pass:
>
> is "ab" ~~ / [ab | a ] b /, "ab", 'normal backtracking';
> is "ab" ~~ / [ab | a ]: b /, Nil, 'locally disabled backtracking';
> is "ab" ~~ / :r [ab | a ] b /, Nil, 'glob
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 10:03:52 -0700, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> Based on S05, these test-cases should all pass:
>
> is "ab" ~~ / [ab | a ] b /, "ab", 'normal backtracking';
> is "ab" ~~ / [ab | a ]: b /, Nil, 'locally disabled backtracking';
> is "ab" ~~ / :r [ab | a ] b /, Nil, 'glob
25 matches
Mail list logo
