t; performance, but to
reduce error-prone redundancy in my program.)
Any ideas?
Peter Schwenn
P.S. In future I will use the IRC or the perl6-user mailing list for non-
bugs.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:33 PM, David Warring via RT <
perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
&g
Perl 6'rs
I'm gmake'ing parrot under Windows 7 64-bit, preparatory to building rakudo.
I'm using the latest parrot and rakudo via git.
My perl is latest stawberry/vanilla perl.
parrot: perl Configure.plruns fine, but
parrot: gmake runs on quite awhile without problems but finishes with:
:\rakudo\parrot\runtime\parrot\dynext\os.dll to same
address as parent: 0x32 != 0x34
Any ideas?
Thank you,
Peter Schwenn
To answer my own question:
I found I could get passed this error by building in a Cygwin context.
(The problem may have been a mixup [on the part of cmd.exe] about whether
the filesystem separator is / or \ )
Thank you
Peter Schwenn
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peter Schwenn
awberry perl 5.12 and git 1.7.0.2, and am running under Windows
7.
Any ideas?
Thank you,
Peter Schwenn
t; The procedure entry point parrot_pcc-constants could not be located in
> the
> > dynamic link library libparrot.dll.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Peter Schwenn
> >
> > p.s. I have my rakudo directly under C:\, ditto for parrot. So my
> > configu
makefile / for \ in
"c:\strawberry\perl\bin\perl.exe"), then rakudo builds properly.
So perhaps its a parrot_config problem.
Peter Schwenn
On 5/18/09, chromatic wrote:
> On Monday 18 May 2009 12:20:47 Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>
> > I'm more likely to suspect tha
e "version" in the parrot home directory is written
"1.1.0" - but SVN reports the revision 38910 correctly.
I have been successfully compiling parrot and rakudo for several months
without any significant problem, and started to encounter this about 2 days
ago May 16.
Peter
t settings that makes Pugs aware of Parrot's presence?
Sincerely,
Peter Schwenn
[p.s. I have successfully built pugs-6.2.11 with Ghc-4.11 w/ hs-plugins
support, and parrot-0.4.1 (with built source tree) both under FedoraC4
linux, but Pugs does not see Parrot when I try, e.g., pugs -Bparr
Perl6ers,
What is the most commonly used development platform (os and machine) by
folks on this group?
PeterS
Steve Peters wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 09:50:49PM -0500, Peter Schwenn wrote:
I've spent a couple of days trying out Cygwin, MinGW, PXPerl, and other
Windows based con
rted.
One more pointer, an elaboration, (a general one to documentation one
relation of Pugs to embedded Parrot even better): if Pugs doesn't have a
feature yet, like much of Rules, does it ship it off to embedded Parrot
for potential help?
Thanks again
Luke Palmer wrote:
On 12/23/05
And then ... ? Does Pugs see and invoke that Parrot available in PATH
without some explicit command or parameter when running PUGS?
Gaal Yahas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:24:54PM -0500, Peter Schwenn wrote:
How does Pugs use Parrot "external" as opposed to "embedded"
Dear self,
I've since discovered the prior discussion of Pugs under Cygwin so I
know there's probably not yet a simple answer but enough of a work
around to go forward (building and using Pugs+Parrot+... under Cygwin.)
Peter Schwenn
Peter Schwenn wrote:
Perl6'ers
Und
Perl6'ers
Under Cygwin (bash), while building PUGS, Pugs' Makefile.PL (one of its
henchmen) needs an environment setting to say where a runnable 'ghc' can
be found. I have GHC installed (in its .msi incarnation as required) in
c:/cygwin/home/me/ghc
I tried:
setenv GHC=/home/me/ghc/bin
How does Pugs use Parrot "external" as opposed to "embedded"?
(e.g. as expressed in:
CAVEATS FOR ALL USERS
-
Parrot is used to provide Perl6-style regular expressions.
Perl5-style regular expressions (eg, rx:perl5/foo/) can be used
without any parrot at all. Pugs can be buil
In order to Makefile.PL Pugs, what is the environment variable that
points to GHC?
Dear 6Compilers,
Cygwin isn't entirely happy with Parrot (don't know about Pugs). Is the
best approach on "plain" windows for setting up perl5+pugs+parrot to:
1. set up a gcc environment
2. get the tar.gz sources involved
3. use gcc's make tomake, make test, make install each
for potential help?
Thanks again
Luke Palmer wrote:
On 12/23/05, Peter Schwenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perl6'ers
Is the "best" (most complete as to Perl6 Language) current setup (for
experimenting with Perl6 source code) currently a hybrid: Pugs with
embedded Parrot, or is
Perl6'ers
Is the "best" (most complete as to Perl6 Language) current setup (for
experimenting with Perl6 source code) currently a hybrid: Pugs with
embedded Parrot, or is it Perl5 with a large set of Perl6'ish modules.
Or something else that I've missed.
For the former case (Pugs+Parrot) whe
19 matches
Mail list logo
