A lot of discussion drifted to this ticket for some reason:
https://github.com/perl6/doc/issues/1428
Let's get ourselves back here.
On 2017-07-31 14:40:50, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> > But do you really think I'm wrong
>
> Nope. I agree it should be tossed.
>
> There's one test in 6.c-errata that m
> But do you really think I'm wrong
Nope. I agree it should be tossed.
There's one test in 6.c-errata that merely tests its nodality.
I'd say deprecate it in 6.d and toss it in 6.e. I listed that on the 6.d's
TODO:
https://github.com/perl6/6.d-prep/commit/2cc614bde4bc5c69884a63c3ba972dfa680b31
> But do you really think I'm wrong
Nope. I agree it should be tossed.
There's one test in 6.c-errata that merely tests its nodality.
I'd say deprecate it in 6.d and toss it in 6.e. I listed that on the 6.d's
TODO:
https://github.com/perl6/6.d-prep/commit/2cc614bde4bc5c69884a63c3ba972dfa680b31
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:03:29 -0800, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> Okay, I get it, I shouldn't have tried to be cute in how I phrased
> that.
Right, it's a bit weird to base your argument on a fictional survey with
results you made up :)
> But do you really think I'm wrong in considering each of the
I took a look through my codebase to see where I have used flatmap. Every
place I think I would prefer map({ }).flat on second look.
so +1
LL
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:47 PM Sam S. wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Sam S.
> # Please include the string: [perl #130520]
> # in the subject line o
# New Ticket Created by Sam S.
# Please include the string: [perl #130520]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130520 >
So, Perl 6 has a built-in `flatmap` routine:
.flatmap({ ... })
Show of hands: Who is reas