On 2017-01-17 21:35, Will Coleda wrote:
> If you'd like to turn this into a doc-u-bug, that's fine; please open
> a ticket at
>
> https://github.com/perl6/doc/issues
Already done and described on earlier timestamp on ticket "Mon, 16 Jan
2017 11:12:59 -0800" by AlexDaniel++
https://github.com/p
If you'd like to turn this into a doc-u-bug, that's fine; please open
a ticket at
https://github.com/perl6/doc/issues
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any time there's a bug report based on a serious misunderstanding of
> language behaviour by someone
Any time there's a bug report based on a serious misunderstanding of
language behaviour by someone otherwise apparently competent, should
it be considered an LTA for the relevant part of the documentation?
On 1/15/17, jn...@jnthn.net via RT wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 05:06:21 -0800, ronaldxs wr
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 05:06:21 -0800, ronaldxs wrote:
> So "42" ~~ / [ "0" || "42" ] | "4" / matches 4 but if you stick to just
> one kind of alternation:
>
> "42" ~~ / [ "0" | "42" ] | "4" /
>
> "42" ~~ / [ "0" || "42" ] || "4" /
>
> the match correctly comes back with 42. It looks like in th
# New Ticket Created by Ron Schmidt
# Please include the string: [perl #130562]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130562 >
So "42" ~~ / [ "0" || "42" ] | "4" / matches 4 but if you stick to just
one kind of altern
