On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 01:54:53 -0700, elizabeth wrote:
>
> > On 23 Jul 2017, at 22:27, Sam S. via RT > follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Which then goes back to: what is the use case of Slipping an Array?
> >
> > Same as slipping any other type of Iterable: Fine-grained, elegant
> > flattening
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 01:54:53 -0700, elizabeth wrote:
>
> > On 23 Jul 2017, at 22:27, Sam S. via RT > follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Which then goes back to: what is the use case of Slipping an Array?
> >
> > Same as slipping any other type of Iterable: Fine-grained, elegant
> > flattening
> On 23 Jul 2017, at 22:27, Sam S. via RT wrote:
>
>> Which then goes back to: what is the use case of Slipping an Array?
>
> Same as slipping any other type of Iterable: Fine-grained, elegant flattening
> and concatenating.
>
> Compare:
>
> my @all = flat
> Which then goes back to: what is the use case of Slipping an Array?
Same as slipping any other type of Iterable: Fine-grained, elegant flattening
and concatenating.
Compare:
my @all = flat $first, @rest;
my @all = $first, |@rest;
When you *know* that $first is a Scalar and @rest is an
> On 23 Jul 2017, at 03:48, Zoffix Znet (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
> # Please include the string: [perl #131783]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> #
> On 23 Jul 2017, at 03:48, Zoffix Znet (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
> # Please include the string: [perl #131783]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> #
Perhaps also worth noting that this applies to other holes as well, e.g. those
created by extending an array:
my @a = 42; @a[5] = 49; say |@a # 42(Mu)(Mu)(Mu)(Mu)49
In fact, this the actual problem the user had.
On 2017-07-22 18:52:03, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 18:48:38
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 18:48:38 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> The current behaviour kinda makes sense when you squint at it, but
> today we had a user[^1]who was surprised by it, so I'm filing it as a
> ticket, if maybe there's some Better Way this can be done with.
>
> When you :delete an element
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 18:48:38 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> The current behaviour kinda makes sense when you squint at it, but
> today we had a user[^1]who was surprised by it, so I'm filing it as a
> ticket, if maybe there's some Better Way this can be done with.
>
> When you :delete an element
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
# Please include the string: [perl #131783]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131783 >
The current behaviour kinda makes sense when you squint at it, but today we had
a
10 matches
Mail list logo