[perl #132012] Numeric values of signals are wrong (say +SIGUSR1)

2017-10-18 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 08:29:50 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > Something fishy going on with the Signals enum. If that's fixed then > the > regression you pointed out will be fixed as well, as the new method > simply > uses enum's `.value` to get the signal number: > > c:

[perl #132012] Numeric values of signals are wrong (say +SIGUSR1)

2017-09-01 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
We now have a note in the docs about this. When fixed, change the docs accordingly (*maybe* saying that versions before X are known to have a bug). https://github.com/perl6/doc/commit/39e3efc08d See IRC discussion: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-09-01#i_15103501 On 2017-09-01 03:33:34,