You are right, they _SHOULD_ have been Unix line-breaks. I'm not sure
how or why they ended up going in as Win32. But I'll look into it.
Thanks.
Adam
Darren Duncan wrote:
At 1:09 AM +1100 3/14/05, Adam Kennedy wrote:
At the request of Autrijus, I've just checked the P5 current version
of Algorit
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:16:07PM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
> At 1:09 AM +1100 3/14/05, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> >At the request of Autrijus, I've just checked the P5 current version
> >of Algorithm::Dependency into pugs, and now we need volunteers to
> >P6ify it.
>
> As a reminder to those of y
At 1:09 AM +1100 3/14/05, Adam Kennedy wrote:
At the request of Autrijus, I've just checked the P5 current version
of Algorithm::Dependency into pugs, and now we need volunteers to
P6ify it.
As a reminder to those of you for whom it isn't common sense, the
standard way to distribute code on the
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 09:32:52PM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
> I can't promise a fully correct solution, since I'm not familiar with
> this module yet, but I can at least do a large chunk of the
> translation on this module, and do it quickly. -- Darren Duncan
Wonderful, you++! :)
Thanks,
/Au
I can't promise a fully correct solution, since I'm not familiar with
this module yet, but I can at least do a large chunk of the
translation on this module, and do it quickly. -- Darren Duncan
At 1:09 AM +1100 3/14/05, Adam Kennedy wrote:
At the request of Autrijus, I've just checked the P5 cur
At the request of Autrijus, I've just checked the P5 current version of
Algorithm::Dependency into pugs, and now we need volunteers to P6ify it.
Why this module as the next "porting a module"
1. Genuinely useful (for many things)
2. Very heavily tested, with tests accumulated for corner cases and
