Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Re: Giving data about why it's hard to use B:: to port to the JVM]
> Yes, *PLEASE*. Some hard data is always nice, even when (or especially
> when) it's unpleasant to hear.
I won't have "hard numbers", as it is always completely possible that some
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 08:18:05AM -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 05:06:27AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Because the Python folks didn't have a problem basing JPython off of
> > > CPython.
> >
> > Actually, this one isn't a good comparison. Python is substant
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 05:06:27AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Because the Python folks didn't have a problem basing JPython off of
> > CPython.
>
> Actually, this one isn't a good comparison. Python is substantially easier
> to parse, and, is a much simpler language. I like Perl becaus
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 05:55 PM 12/7/00 +, Piers Cawley wrote:
> >Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I think I'd just as soon always call DESTROY in a predicable manner
> > > and not do *anything* perlish at GC time. If nothing else it means
> > > that we do
