Re: RFC archive?

2001-02-20 Thread Adam Turoff
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 04:58:11PM -0800, Matthew Cline wrote: > What's the URL for the RFC archive? http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ Z.

Re: C Garbage collector

2001-02-20 Thread Damien Neil
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 12:25:10AM +, Alan Burlison wrote: > Shame it only works with the Sun compilers. See also Boehm's garbage collector, which is rather more portable: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/ "The collector uses a mark-sweep algorithm. It provides incremental

RFC archive?

2001-02-20 Thread Matthew Cline
What's the URL for the RFC archive? Thanks in advance. -- Matthew Cline| Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose that [EMAIL PROTECTED] | you were a member of Congress. But I repeat | myself. -- Mark Twain

C Garbage collector

2001-02-20 Thread Alan Burlison
Documentation excerpt: With Sun WorkShop Memory Monitor, you can program without calling free() or delete. Determining when to call free() or delete is difficult. Studies indicate that 30% to 40% of programmer time is spent on memory management in C or C++ programs. Failing to release memory cau

Re: C Garbage collector

2001-02-20 Thread Alan Burlison
Alan Burlison wrote: > I've attached the HTML Well it was there when I sent it... does this list strip attachments or something? Here is is as badly-formatted text - sorry! Alan Burlison Appendix A: How Sun WorkShop Memory Monitor Works Memory management in C/C++ is both time consuming an

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread David L. Nicol
Simply Hao wrote: > > Douglas Adams does seem rather more appropriate a source of quotes > > for software (anyone's, alas) than Pratchett. > > But Adams already has a software company. And Sirius pioneered the GPP in Perl 6.

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread Simply Hao
> Douglas Adams does seem rather more appropriate a source of quotes > for software (anyone's, alas) than Pratchett. But Adams already has a software company. -Hao

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:17:25 + Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:43:11PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > My name (Merijn) is *from* Tolkien's dutch translation, so I'm a little biases > > if I state: "Stick with Tolkien". Well, I'm of to Mordor now ... > >

Re: PDD for code comments ????

2001-02-20 Thread David L. Nicol
David Mitchell wrote: > 4. Are we all agreed that in addition to anything else (eg rfc281), at > least some of the standard commentary should appear actually within the > src file itself? s/at least some/most, if not all/ > 5. Do *all* these comments need to be extractable, or only ones related

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:43:11PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > My name (Merijn) is *from* Tolkien's dutch translation, so I'm a little biases > if I state: "Stick with Tolkien". Well, I'm of to Mordor now ... http://www.prembone.com/mythtakes/shiresong.html --

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:18:31 + Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 06:06:49PM +, David Mitchell wrote: > > > > And what about us poor semi-literates who've never heard of Yojimbo ??? > > > > If we can't go with Tolkien, I'd vote for Pratchett, 'cause *everyo

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread Buddha Buck
At 06:18 PM 02-20-2001 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: >As long as Terry Pratchett writes books faster than perl consumes quotes. >Based on the fact that he's still very alive, we aren't in danger yet. True... And he has some very good quotes. >However, Larry has already commented on the danger of

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 07:52 PM 2/20/2001 +0200, Roman M. Parparov wrote: >On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:57:10PM +, David Mitchell wrote: > > > Do we want to go with Tolkein quotes for perl 6 and, if so, who wants to > > > put together a list of good ones? It's been ages since I've read the > books, > > > and I'm l

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 05:57 PM 2/20/2001 +, David Mitchell wrote: > > Do we want to go with Tolkein quotes for perl 6 and, if so, who wants to > > put together a list of good ones? It's been ages since I've read the > books, > > and I'm likely to pull quotes from other places anyway. (Usagi Yojimbo > > strikes

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 06:06:49PM +, David Mitchell wrote: > > > And what about us poor semi-literates who've never heard of Yojimbo ??? > > > If we can't go with Tolkien, I'd vote for Pratchett, 'cause *everyone*'s > > > read him :-) > > > > Adams rather than Pratchett, I'd think. :) > > B

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread David Mitchell
> > And what about us poor semi-literates who've never heard of Yojimbo ??? > > If we can't go with Tolkien, I'd vote for Pratchett, 'cause *everyone*'s > > read him :-) > > Adams rather than Pratchett, I'd think. :) But Pratchet has 20+ books to his credit, so we need never run out of quotes :-

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread David Mitchell
> Do we want to go with Tolkein quotes for perl 6 and, if so, who wants to > put together a list of good ones? It's been ages since I've read the books, > and I'm likely to pull quotes from other places anyway. (Usagi Yojimbo > strikes me as a good place to yank from, as does Zot!, but Pratchet

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread Roman M. Parparov
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:57:10PM +, David Mitchell wrote: > > Do we want to go with Tolkein quotes for perl 6 and, if so, who wants to > > put together a list of good ones? It's been ages since I've read the books, > > and I'm likely to pull quotes from other places anyway. (Usagi Yojimbo

Re: Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 04:50 PM 2/20/2001 +, David Mitchell wrote: > > Tolkien quotes are mandatory? > > > > perl5's globals.c malloc.c perlio.c perly.c universal.c xsutils.c > > definitely fail then. > >Sounds like some urgent patches need submitting to p5p ;-) Do we want to go with Tolkein quotes for perl 6 an

Tolkein (was Re: PDD for code comments ????)

2001-02-20 Thread David Mitchell
> Tolkien quotes are mandatory? > > perl5's globals.c malloc.c perlio.c perly.c universal.c xsutils.c > definitely fail then. Sounds like some urgent patches need submitting to p5p ;-)

Re: PDD for code comments ????

2001-02-20 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 10:49, David Mitchell wrote: > Regarding comments in code: > 2. Is this the time and place to discuss it? Certainly before we actually begin coding > > 3. Should the result of the discusssion be a PDD? Yes. > > 5. Do *all* these comments need to be extractable

Re: PDD for code comments ????

2001-02-20 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 03:49:44PM +, David Mitchell wrote: > 4. Are we all agreed that in addition to anything else (eg rfc281), at > least some of the standard commentary should appear actually within the > src file itself? quote from someone recently "separate documentation is no documenta

Re: PDD for code comments ????

2001-02-20 Thread David Mitchell
Regarding comments in code: Chopping and misquoting wildly Jarkko Hietaniemi said: * I would define a relatively strict and standard way to do this so that the documentation can be extracted out. * lets avoid a markup-up flamewar Simon Cozens said: * I'd like to see Perl 6 written as a li