Re: op code bof

2001-07-19 Thread Uri Guttman
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> At 07:51 PM 7/19/2001 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 01:40:50PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: >> > >> > Sure, sounds good. I'll see about having the first draft of the "Parrot >> > Assembly Language Manual an

Re: op code bof

2001-07-19 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 07:51 PM 7/19/2001 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: >On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 01:40:50PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > > Sure, sounds good. I'll see about having the first draft of the "Parrot > > Assembly Language Manual and Architecture Handbook" PDD with me too. > (All I > > need to do now is w

Re: op code bof

2001-07-19 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 01:40:50PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Sure, sounds good. I'll see about having the first draft of the "Parrot > Assembly Language Manual and Architecture Handbook" PDD with me too. (All I > need to do now is write it...) The Palmah. Our canon of scripture? -- Pau

Re: op code bof

2001-07-19 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 01:30 PM 7/19/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DS> We'll find a room, never fear. Lunch wednesday is still the best > DS> time, I think. > >fine. is gathering first at the exhibit hall a good idea? just a well >known point of refere

Re: op code bof

2001-07-19 Thread Uri Guttman
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> We'll find a room, never fear. Lunch wednesday is still the best DS> time, I think. fine. is gathering first at the exhibit hall a good idea? just a well known point of reference. >> do we want/need a white board? i will be bringi

Re: op code bof

2001-07-19 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 01:04 AM 7/19/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: >i say we keep it at 12:30 on wed. we can meet at the exhibit hall (which >is where i will be much of that day). then we can find some place to >take over and bof the op code stuff. any other meeting places can be >suggested. i don't want to juggle t