On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:26:28PM -0500, Sam Tregar wrote:
> Maybe I'm anal retentive, but I don't know if I'm ready to start writing
> methods I can't test!
You prefer to write tests for things that don't exist? :) Ah well, have
it your own way. (That's to say, yes, I'd love to see some tests f
Hi all,
I made some little changes to pbc2c.pl to make it work with all
(working) examples.
I'm sorry that it throws some nasty warnings, maybe it's possible
to remove them using opcode_t * instead of int.
Opinions more than welcome.
Brent Dax:
# 1. No if(s|sc, i|ic)
# We're treating strings as second-class citizens here. Why
# shouldn't you
# be able to do an 'if' on a string? You could interpret it as the
# string's length, or the string's length && string ne "0".
#
# 2. No unless
# 'unless' is often more useful than 'if'.
> So I know for the first-stage rollout, does Apache's module system support
> Apache managing filehandles and modules calling apache's I/O routines, or
> does it just do weird magic with I/O on normal filehandles?
I'm pretty sure that for a simple implementation, we only need to worry
about "
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
> You are all encouraged to write implementations of the vtable functions
> in scalarclass.c
Cool. So, what needs to get done first? By that I mean, what is standing
in the way of our creating tests for scalar PMCs? Maybe I'm anal
retentive, but I don'
Tom Hughes:
# In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# "Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#
# > 4. eq and friends: string variants
# > One thing that seems to be missing is string and numeric
# variants on the
# > comparison ops. While this isn't a problem now, it may be
# once we get
# > P
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4. eq and friends: string variants
> One thing that seems to be missing is string and numeric variants on the
> comparison ops. While this isn't a problem now, it may be once we get
> PMCs.
Both string and numeric
I've fixed (I hope) the huge horrible problem whereby vtable_ops was
trying to do pointer arithmetic on struct entries, by making the
multimethod entries into an array of function pointers. I've also
made the vtable functions take a pointer to the interpreter, in case
they need to do any GC stuff.
