Hi Mike
> We have three memory_pools: memory, string, and constant_string. Is there
> any reason that string and memory are distinct? (aside from code
> simplicity).
> Seems to create a lot of duplicate logic with the need to support a string
> version and a generic buffer version of everything,
Dan Sugalski:
# At 5:28 PM -0700 5/16/02, Brent Dax wrote:
# >Dan Sugalski:
# ># Okay, I've checked in the final changes to this edit of
# PDD 2, the #
# >vtable pdd. Tine to rip into it^W^W^Wexamine it closely. :)
# >
# >I guess I'm first.
# >
# >I think the PARROT_TRUE/PARROT_FALSE thing is a
At 5:28 PM -0700 5/16/02, Brent Dax wrote:
>Dan Sugalski:
># Okay, I've checked in the final changes to this edit of PDD 2, the
># vtable pdd. Tine to rip into it^W^W^Wexamine it closely. :)
>
>I guess I'm first.
>
>I think the PARROT_TRUE/PARROT_FALSE thing is a Really Bad Idea.
I'm not thrilled
Dan Sugalski:
# Okay, I've checked in the final changes to this edit of PDD 2, the
# vtable pdd. Tine to rip into it^W^W^Wexamine it closely. :)
I guess I'm first.
I think the PARROT_TRUE/PARROT_FALSE thing is a Really Bad Idea.
I understand that we need a way to indicate exceptions. However,
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:25:39PM -0300, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 May 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > Anyone care to take this task on? It doesn't have to be at all fancy.
> > In fact, all it needs to do is handle:
> >
> >*) Label offset calcs
> >*) Explicit, fully-qualifie
Okay, I've checked in the final changes to this edit of PDD 2, the
vtable pdd. Tine to rip into it^W^W^Wexamine it closely. :)
--
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski even sam
# New Ticket Created by "Wild Cats"
# Please include the string: [netlabs #591]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://bugs6.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=591 >
Hello I am your hot lil horny toy.
I am the one you dream About,
I am a very
Heya,
We have three memory_pools: memory, string, and constant_string. Is there
any reason that string and memory are distinct? (aside from code
simplicity).
In general, is it possible that we will have other constant buffer values
besides strings.
Basically, how come we don't just have a memor
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Anyone care to take this task on? It doesn't have to be at all fancy.
> In fact, all it needs to do is handle:
>
>*) Label offset calcs
>*) Explicit, fully-qualified, opcode names
>*) Opcode args as either labels or numbers
>
> So we'd only p
Melvin Smith:
# If we are not to put non-embed visible in config.h, we must
# pre-process parrot.h, because I need to put symbls such as
# EXP_NETWORKING somewhere.
#
# If you ever develop for Linux kernel you are familiar with
# the practice of making new major features config options
#
If we are not to put non-embed visible in config.h, we must
pre-process parrot.h, because I need to put symbls such as
EXP_NETWORKING somewhere.
If you ever develop for Linux kernel you are familiar with the
practice of making new major features config options
Would you like to turn on Netwo
Is CVS access for Parrot still invitation-only? If not, I would like to
request CVS access. I have posted mildly useful patches (mostly warning
fixes really) in the past; I don't think any have ever been rejected.
The CVS page at dev.perl.org/cvs implies that a maintainer (probably Dan I
guess)
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> It's not nice. It's enough to drive people loopy, just looking at the output
> of the preprocessor, where one source line has expanded to a 10 line wrapped
> monstrosity so right in parenthesis that it couldn't be written with a dozen
> Lisp fridge mag
# New Ticket Created by Joe Yates
# Please include the string: [netlabs #590]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://bugs6.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=590 >
Dear all,
In parrot code, I'm trying to print the following string:
\0
I.e. t
14 matches
Mail list logo
