Andy Dougherty:
# You'll probably also want the enhanced sprintf tests (or
# something like
# them.) Currently, the only one that fails for me is the
# %5.3f test, which gives 0.500 in stdio, but
# 0.5 from Parrot.
I finally tracked down this bug. If you look,
At 10:07 PM -0700 10/9/02, Robert Spier wrote:
> >I'll see about getting some of the internal structures diagrammed
>>better, which is the only place things are a little dodgy, but that's
>>otherwise fine.
>
>Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dropped me an email and reminded
>me about AutoDia http
core_ops.c(19) : warning C4005: 'CONST' : macro redefinition
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio
..NET\Vc7\PlatformSDK\Include\WinDef.h(138) : see previous definition of
'CONST'
jit_cpu.c(20) : warning C4005: 'CONST' : macro redefinition
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Stud
>>So the html is canonical and you're converting it to pod? I'm
>> confused.
>I am writing it in my own format. It lets me take notes, write todo
>lists, autogenerate the table of contents and glossary. Then I run it
>through some perl that currently spits out html and almost make pod.
Whatev
>I'll see about getting some of the internal structures diagrammed
>better, which is the only place things are a little dodgy, but that's
>otherwise fine.
Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dropped me an email and reminded
me about AutoDia http://droogs.org/autodia/
>Now, here's hoping CVS doesn't
Robert Spier wrote:
>>This version is in html. I almost have the pod version ready.
>>
>>
>
>So the html is canonical and you're converting it to pod? I'm
>confused.
>
>
I am writing it in my own format. It lets me take notes, write todo
lists, autogenerate the table of contents and g
At 7:42 PM -0700 10/8/02, Steve Fink wrote:
>Thanks, applied.
>
>Who came up with the idea of two-argument ne, anyway? That's kind of
>bizarre.
Definitely bizarre. I think I'd rather not have it, it doesn't make much sense.
--
Dan
--
At 11:28 PM -0400 10/8/02, Erik Lechak wrote:
>Well here it is, my first attempt at a "getting started" guide.
>It's not ready for public consumption, but I would like to hear some
>feedback. The later sections are blank or contain notes in a not
>nice format. As time moves on and I learn mor
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just had a quick look at hash.h (which I should have done in the
> first place) and you're quite right. Second attempt at a correct patch
> below.
>
> All tests still pass, but this isn't much comfort, as
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Tom Hughes wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This one happens because entry is a HASH_ENTRY*, but get_pmc_keyed is
> > expecting a PMC*. However, by this point in the function, we've already
> > verified that
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > diff -r -u parrot-orig/t/src/sprintf.t parrot-andy/t/src/sprintf.t
>
> > + dval = 1.0e6;
> > + S = Parrot_sprintf_c(interpreter, "== %g\n", dval);
> > +
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This one happens because entry is a HASH_ENTRY*, but get_pmc_keyed is
> expecting a PMC*. However, by this point in the function, we've already
> verified that entry is actually a PMC*, so it should be safe to a
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:14:50AM -0400, Tanton Gibbs wrote:
>
> In order, the other significant compiler warnings I see are:
>
> perlhash.pmc: In function `Parrot_PerlHash_get_pmc_keyed':
> perlhash.pmc:192: warning: passing arg 2 of pointer to funct
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:14:50AM -0400, Tanton Gibbs wrote:
> There were a number of warnings which read something like
> "structure padded for alignment of member value in debug.h"
>
> This can be trivially fixed by reordering the structure members ( I hope).
> This patch works fine on cygwin,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> diff -r -u parrot-orig/t/src/sprintf.t parrot-andy/t/src/sprintf.t
> + dval = 1.0e6;
> + S = Parrot_sprintf_c(interpreter, "== %g\n", dval);
> + printf("%g %s", dval, string_to_cstring(interpreter, S));
Aargh. I fo
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > # Unfortunately, the compact-looking
> > #
> > # ch=va_arg((va_list)obj->data, char);
> > #
> > # gave Sun's compiler indigestion.
> Hmm. Just removing the (va_list) cast makes both Sun's compiler and
> gcc happy. (That's because va_list is
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
> Andy Dougherty:
> # Overall, it continues to look very good. Unfortunately, the
> # compact-looking
> #
> # ch=va_arg((va_list)obj->data, char);
> #
> # gave Sun's compiler indigestion. I had to split it up into
> # the much more pedestrian
> #
>
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 08:49 AM, Erik Lechak wrote:
>> Oh, and spell Piers Cawley's name correctly! :-)
>>
>
> DAMN! I new that would happen. Piers, if your out there listening,
> forgive me.
Did you misspell it a "Bunch" of times?
(Sorry Piers, couldn't resist!)
David
--
Davi
Andy Dougherty:
# Overall, it continues to look very good. Unfortunately, the
# compact-looking
#
# ch=va_arg((va_list)obj->data, char);
#
# gave Sun's compiler indigestion. I had to split it up into
# the much more pedestrian
#
# va_list arg;
# arg = (va_list) obj->data;
#
Steve Fink wrote:
>
>Oh, and spell Piers Cawley's name correctly! :-)
>
>
DAMN! I new that would happen. Piers, if your out there listening,
forgive me.
Erik
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
[Brent continues to churn out amazing quantities of good stuff]
Overall, it continues to look very good. Unfortunately, the compact-looking
ch=va_arg((va_list)obj->data, char);
gave Sun's compiler indigestion. I had to split it up into the much
more p
# New Ticket Created by Brent Dax
# Please include the string: [perl #17817]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17817 >
Inspiration struck me as I was working on bug fixes for Parrot_sprintf's
patch yesterday.
22 matches
Mail list logo
