On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:43:23PM -0400, Simon Glover wrote:
>
> I've just tried to write PASM like:
>
> new P0, .IntList
> new P1, .PerlInt
>
> set P1, 20
> set P0[0], P1
> ...
> end
>
> only to have it fail with the message:
>
>'Subscript on something that's
Simon Glover:
# On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
# Your problem was probably forgetting to use Test::More
# (which defines skip). In any case, the enclosed patch should
# do the trick.
#
# +SKIP: { skip("Doesn't work with JIT enabled", 1);
# output_like(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', "restart t
I've just tried to write PASM like:
new P0, .IntList
new P1, .PerlInt
set P1, 20
set P0[0], P1
...
end
only to have it fail with the message:
'Subscript on something that's not an aggregate!'
Is this a bug or a feature?
Simon
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #17907]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17907 >
I've been browsing the docs, and took the time to do a bit of copyediting.
There's room
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
[Discussion snipped]
> Yes, I get this also. I was trying to figure out how to properly use
> TODO or SKIP or something to suppress this, but none of them worked
> quite right -- it would say that the failed test was a TODO, but it
> still counted it as a
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:08:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:06:48AM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:05:56PM -0700, Joe Wilson wrote:
> > > Perhaps this is a known issue...
> > >
> > > Most parrot programs seem to crash on x86 when the lates
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #17903]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17903 >
Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op;
as an added bonus,
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #17901]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17901 >
Patch below adds tests for the eq, ne, lt, le, gt, ge & neg ops for
PerlInts and P
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #17899]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17899 >
This patch:
1) Fixes some minor nits in the assembler documentation (mostly POD
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:06:48AM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:05:56PM -0700, Joe Wilson wrote:
> > Perhaps this is a known issue...
> >
> > Most parrot programs seem to crash on x86 when the latest CVS parrot
> > is compiled with "-O2" or "-g -O2" and when JIT is enabl
Jerome Quelin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just discovered that:
> a) my befunge interpreter is broken (would you stop beaking it please? :o))
> b) push and pop operations are now supported by lists
> c) there's a pmc for handling list of integers: intlist
> So, what else can I do? Catching exc
Tom Hughes wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Leopold Toetsch (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's probably best to do whatever C99 does, which I think is the same
> as what glibc does, namely to return the amount of space that would be
> needed to avoid truncation if the
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #17896]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17896 >
This patch:
i) Adds several new tests for PerlHash, specifically:
- storing
On Sunday 13 October 2002 12:16, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 07:29:04PM +0200, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> > FYI, I just rsync'ed this afternoon (12/10/2002 14:52 GMT) my Parrot, and
> > did the traditionnal: perl Configure.pl ; make; make test
> > and yes, all the tests went ok...
> I'
On Sunday 13 October 2002 12:11, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jerome Quelin wrote:
> > eq S0, "<", FLOW_GO_WEST
> [ branch not taken ]
> > And while I'm talking about strange things... Due to the fact that Parrot
> > does not branch to the correct label,
> As strings are involved, could you in
>From my point of view - it isn't.
As I said in an earlier post, my Befunge interpreter is broken. It was doing
well not so long ago. Anyway, since I wanted to add intlists and push/pop, I
made some modifications. But I can't test them, since Parrot seems to be
badly broken...
At first, I tho
Jerome Quelin wrote:
> eq S0, "<", FLOW_GO_WEST
[ branch not taken ]
> And while I'm talking about strange things... Due to the fact that Parrot
> does not branch to the correct label,
As strings are involved, could you insert:
sweepoff
collectoff
as the very fi
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 04:53:57PM +0200, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> But I have a problem. When popping a value from an empty list, I get a "No
> entries on list!" exception. Instead, I want to get a zero. I can add
> something like:
>
> CHECK_EMPTY:
> set I0, P2
> eq I0, 0, PUSH_ZERO
> ret
>
Jerome Quelin:
# On Saturday 12 October 2002 18:26, Brent Dax wrote:
# > # So, what else can I do? Catching exceptions (is that
# possible # with
# > Parrot)? Not just yet. The ideas for exceptions are still bouncing
# > around in the caverns of Dan's brain. :^)
#
# So, what am I suppose to
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:05:56PM -0700, Joe Wilson wrote:
> Perhaps this is a known issue...
>
> Most parrot programs seem to crash on x86 when the latest CVS parrot
> is compiled with "-O2" or "-g -O2" and when JIT is enabled.
> The programs appear to run to completion and only crash prior to
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 07:29:04PM +0200, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> FYI, I just rsync'ed this afternoon (12/10/2002 14:52 GMT) my Parrot, and did
> the traditionnal: perl Configure.pl ; make; make test
> and yes, all the tests went ok...
I'll look into it, but could you try doing a make clean first
On Saturday 12 October 2002 18:26, Brent Dax wrote:
> # So, what else can I do? Catching exceptions (is that possible
> # with Parrot)?
> Not just yet. The ideas for exceptions are still bouncing around in the
> caverns of Dan's brain. :^)
So, what am I suppose to do? Is there a way to get the
On Saturday 12 October 2002 17:56, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > So, what else can I do? Catching exceptions (is that possible with
> > Parrot)?
> Please have a look at list - not a PMC currently but can/does simulate
> intlist now for testing. just compile/link list instead of intlist.
> list_pop(..
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:08:27PM +, Simon Glover wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
> # Please include the string: [perl #17865]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17865 >
>
>
>
> One of
--Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@roles=map {"Parrot $_"} qw(embedding regexen Configure)
Wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in
New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. And radio operates
exactly the same way. The only difference is that there is no cat.
Jerome Quelin wrote:
> My goal is to provide a Befunge interpreter that just does the right thing
> out of the box - that is, that does not need to patch Parrot in order to
> function.
Arrays (and all classes) are currently reorganized. The mentioned patch
is a current hack, to get your exp
26 matches
Mail list logo
