On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 15:19, Erik Lechak wrote:
Almost got to this one within a week! ;-)
>
> 2) When I reply should I 'reply to all' or just reply to
> perl6-internals? (This is my first mailing list)
I know Dan addressed part of this in his reply, but there's one
other reason for 'reply to
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 10:49 AM +0200 10/18/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
In perl.perl6.internals, you wrote:
Do you have a more verbose description of variable/value separation?
Sure. Aggregates are a good one. For example, let's assume you have an
array that can only hold real objects. Th
Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #18008]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18008 >
list_push(interpreter, list, (void*) 'a'+i, enum_ty
Just in case folks missed it, I fixed the docs for the splice vtable
entries in PDD2.
--
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Just in case folks missed it, I fixed the docs for the splice vtable
entries in PDD2.
Ah, thanks. I'll implement splice in the next days.
leo
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, it's been a while, I've been out of it, it's time to start getting
going.
Welcome back.
Today's first topic: PMCs with real initializers. Here's a snip from the
updated PDD2:
Done.
leo
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 04:39:52PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Here are logical shift right opcodes for the ARM jit.
> (Cargo cult coding)
Thanks, applied
Nicholas Clark
--
Brainfuck better than perl? http://www.perl.org/advocacy/spoofathon/
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
>
> > # New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
> > # Please include the string: [perl #18008]
> > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> > # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=1
Well here it is. The latest and greatest. Making its first appearance
in POD, the "getting started" guide. There is a lot of work to do on
it. There are sections that read like bad notes. But some might find
this realease of use.
And in my tinkering around, I compile a lot. I have also a
I was surfing on parrotcode.org and saw it's not really up-to-date...
At least, it still show version 0.0.7 as the current one.
Maybe there are also others things to change?
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 9:27 PM +0200 10/19/02, Jerome Quelin wrote:
I was surfing on parrotcode.org and saw it's not really up-to-date...
At least, it still show version 0.0.7 as the current one.
Maybe there are also others things to change?
Yep, it's pretty out of date. I at least fixed the version number and
lin
11 matches
Mail list logo