[CVS ci] removed (was: removiing classes/intqueue.pmc)

2002-11-09 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Leopold Toetsch wrote: If no one hollers, I'll remove the IntQueue class. - only used in some tests AFAIK - functionality may be written in terms of intlist push/pop - has a weird syntax for queue/dequeue - is broken WRT memory management and clone IntQueue is history. Please run 'make

mem leaks test summary

2002-11-09 Thread Leopold Toetsch
After removing IntQueue this is the state of memory leaks[1] (i386/linux): Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed --- t/op/hacks.t 21 50,00% 1 t/op/rx.t23

[CVS ci] (was: Should memory be washed?)

2002-11-09 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski wrote: At 8:58 PM +0100 11/6/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote: If we want this, then lets have Parrot_{re,}allocate{,zeroed}. The allocate_string variants are ok with unzeroed mem already. Which was my thought here. Things that care can ask for zeroed memory, which they may get

NULL (was Re: cvs commit: parrot interpreter.c stacks.c)

2002-11-09 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:09:39AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -/* Initialize the integer register chunk */ -interpreter-ctx.int_reg_base-used = 0; +/* Initialize the register chunks */ interpreter-ctx.int_reg_base-free = FRAMES_PER_INT_REG_CHUNK; -