Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:09:39AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-interpreter->ctx.int_reg_base->prev = NULL;
It's not likely to be a portability problem, as I seem to remember that the C
FAQ is only able to mention one very obscure platform where NULL was not
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:09:39AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -/* Initialize the integer register chunk */
> -interpreter->ctx.int_reg_base->used = 0;
> +/* Initialize the register chunks */
>interpreter->ctx.int_reg_base->free = FRAMES_PER_INT_REG_CHUNK;
> -
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:58 PM +0100 11/6/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
If we want this, then lets have Parrot_{re,}allocate{,zeroed}.
The allocate_string variants are ok with unzeroed mem already.
Which was my thought here. Things that care can ask for zeroed memory,
which they may get anywa
After removing IntQueue this is the state of memory leaks[1] (i386/linux):
Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
---
t/op/hacks.t 21 50,00% 1
t/op/rx.t23
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
If no one hollers, I'll remove the IntQueue class.
- only used in some tests AFAIK
- functionality may be written in terms of intlist push/pop
- has a weird syntax for queue/dequeue
- is broken WRT memory management and clone
IntQueue is history.
Please run 'make realcl
