--- Ramesh Ananthakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> beg pardon, but that seems to somehow relate to my idea of making
> Parrot sort of OPen Source VMWare. Cool. Otoh, I don't even have a
> clue how to do it, so does anybody have any ideas about this.
>
> cheers,
>
> Ramesh
>
> -ask
Actual
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 05:40:36PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >Is there any speed advantage in truncating by casting via a C type
> >[eg a = (int)(short) b]
> >rather than and on a bitmask
> >[eg a = b & 0x]
> >?
>
>
> gcc uses MOVSX (movs{b,w}l), move byte/word
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #18782]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18782 >
All tests including running JIT show:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed
# New Ticket Created by Alin Iacob
# Please include the string: [perl #18780]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18780 >
As I read the PDDs I notice that some of them say 'perl' where it should really say
'parr
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 11:15:28AM +0100, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> When I want to save all the integer registers, I'm using pushi,
> restoring them later with popi.
> When I'm doing a pushi, the old values of the registers are still
> present, but I'm wondering wether I can rely on this behavior,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:56:50AM +, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> The following patch introduces a new file in the befunge interpreter
> that will hold all the debug-related material.
Thanks applied.
> Soon, we'll have a fully-functionnal debugger within the befunge
> interpreter with breakpoint
# New Ticket Created by Jerome Quelin
# Please include the string: [perl #18773]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18773 >
Hi,
The following patch introduces a new file in the befunge interpreter
that will ho
Hi,
When I want to save all the integer registers, I'm using pushi,
restoring them later with popi.
When I'm doing a pushi, the old values of the registers are still
present, but I'm wondering wether I can rely on this behavior, or if
it's accidental and may be removed with another implementati
Alex Gough (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Alex Gough
# Please include the string: [perl #18762]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18762 >
... so using math.so is probably not the way to
test the nci,
Jerome Quelin wrote:
On Vendredi 29 Novembre 2002 19:02, you wrote:
This makes me think... A PerlArray can hold PMCs... So I can have a
PerlArray of PerlArrays:
This is always ok.
set P10, P2[1]
set I0, P10[0]
or directly:
set I0, P2[1;0]
It seems to work, and it is (
On Vendredi 29 Novembre 2002 19:02, you wrote:
> > Speaking of limitations, what can hold a multiarray? Only integers,
> > only strings, only pmc, a mix of everything?
> Everything a list can hold (i.e. all above, but no mix), though it
> would need a new class, which takes an list_type initializer
11 matches
Mail list logo
