--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Michael DuPont (via RT) wrote:
>
> >>--- packdump.c 2 Nov 2002 14:57:47 - 1.6
> >>+++ packdump.c 4 Jan 2003 16:18:37 -
>
>
> >>+#ifdef HAS_parrot_string_t_flags
>
> This is already fixed.
thanks, I have not
At 4:17 PM + 1/9/03, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
But I still favor the combination of:
- code reordering, like done for pmc_new
- DOD/GC disabling (e.g. aggregate clone)
- active anchoring to the root set, where above is not appli
At 5:46 PM +0100 1/9/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
ie user code has to have the discipline either to have things linked to the
root set by the time it makes a parrot call or explicitly disable DOD across
such a call.
Yes. We need some XS guidelines anyway. One more rule or l
At 1:46 PM +0100 1/9/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Steve Fink wrote:
(3) propose something else that solves the whole problem neatly.
i.e. reorder code where possible, and anchor early,
RFC: changing the clone op functionality slightly:
Clone does in the first step p
Okay, as promised, here's the object proposal for parrot. (And yes,
it was finished by 5PM EST--if you got it later, it just means I
lingered over coffee in a blissfully wireless-free coffee shop down
the street from my apartment)
Objects, as far as I see it, have the following properties:
1) The
At 2:31 AM -0500 1/9/03, Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Could one of the folks working on the perl 6 parser give us a
status update as to where it stands? Which bits of the apocalypses
don't work, and what parts of the regex definiton's not done yet?
Things have stalled a bit, and
At 3:46 PM -0800 1/8/03, Zach Lipton wrote:
I am pleased to announce that LXR has been installed on perl.org to index
the source of parrot and perl5 (additional modules, such as perl6, can be
added as needed).
Cool. Thanks, Zach.
--
Dan
--
James Michael DuPont (via RT) wrote:
--- packdump.c 2 Nov 2002 14:57:47 - 1.6
+++ packdump.c 4 Jan 2003 16:18:37 -
+#ifdef HAS_parrot_string_t_flags
This is already fixed.
leo
Dan Sugalski wrote:
... (And I don't want
to go with an extra level of indirection for this, for speed reasons)
I did answer, nor do I, but recent cache coherency discussion could
imply, that eg. this wouldn't be to bad.
I thought of:
- a PMC is a handle (index) into
- array of pointers (e.g
# New Ticket Created by James Michael DuPont
# Please include the string: [perl #19874]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=19874 >
this is the patch to compile pdump under linux
basically it removes a field that
Matthew Zimmerman (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Matthew Zimmerman
# Please include the string: [perl #19870]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=19870 >
A CVS update from about 30 minutes ago is faili
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
But I still favor the combination of:
- code reordering, like done for pmc_new
- DOD/GC disabling (e.g. aggregate clone)
- active anchoring to the root set, where above is not applicable
Which combined mea
# New Ticket Created by James Michael DuPont
# Please include the string: [perl #19873]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=19873 >
bug report for parrot/languages/perl6
mike
--- James Michael DuPont <[EMAIL PRO
# New Ticket Created by James Michael DuPont
# Please include the string: [perl #19872]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=19872 >
Missing header file for cygwin
--- James Michael DuPont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
# New Ticket Created by James Michael DuPont
# Please include the string: [perl #19871]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=19871 >
Attached is the bug report and test results for
parrot on cygwin.
--- James Mi
# New Ticket Created by Matthew Zimmerman
# Please include the string: [perl #19870]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=19870 >
A CVS update from about 30 minutes ago is failing to compile
on my Red Hat Linux 7.
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> But I still favor the combination of:
> - code reordering, like done for pmc_new
> - DOD/GC disabling (e.g. aggregate clone)
> - active anchoring to the root set, where above is not applicable
Which combined means that there is no
Piers Cawley wrote:
alloc_and_link( void ** handle, size_t size);
This is covered in Steve Finks summary as solution 3.
There were also two code snippets by Brent Dax and Jerome Vouillon, that
deal with exception handling too. s. thread "Infant mortality" started
by Steve.
Note that NU
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Steve Fink wrote:
(3) propose something else that solves the whole problem neatly.
i.e. reorder code where possible, and anchor early,
RFC: changing the clone op functionality slightly:
Clone does in the first step pmc_new{,noinit} a PMC of the desired type.
This
Sean O'Rourke wrote:
... The
tests should all still pass (barring inclement GC bugs), but they reflect
the outdated spec.
Almost:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t/compiler/1.test
I have here now ~15 files different to CVS, which I would like to sync
in either direction for easier future changes.
So the question is, should I checked it in / partially / forget it.
Changes are:
- SPMC (small or scalar PMC) with half the size of a PMC, no promotion
or whatever to a PMC, disa
This will be vague and handwavy, but I *think* it suggests something
that hasn't been tried before...
1. The problem of infant mortality is that resource allocation can
trigger a DOD run could wipe out the very thing we were allocating
memory for.
2. This can be solved by extending the root
22 matches
Mail list logo
