> Strange. I can ssh in, and apachectl claims that the webserver is running,
> but I'm getting that error too.
>
> Ask, Robert: any ideas?
Looks like the apache had hung somewhere. I shut it down and started
it up, and it seems ok.
-R
Greg --
Thats the centroid. You can see its dual South of Australia.
Regards,
-- Gregor
Greg Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/31/2003 03:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Parrot developer world map
So, what's the yellow dot in the middle
An interactive SVG version is (temporarily) available at:
http://www.focusresearch.com/gregor/map.html
Regards,
-- Gregor
Leon Brocard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/28/2003 05:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Parrot developer world map
Last
Strange. I can ssh in, and apachectl claims that the webserver is running,
but I'm getting that error too.
Ask, Robert: any ideas?
Zach
On 1/31/03 4:09 AM, "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proxy Error
> The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
>
> Th
Robert Spier wrote:
Odd.
There's not enough information in the logs to figure out what's going
on. (And the code shouldn't have this kind of failure mode.)
If it keeps happening, please keep me in the loop.
Todays imcc commit didn't show up at cvs.perl.org.
No error message - looked all goo
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET
/tinderbox/bdshowbuild.cgi.
Reason: Could not connect to remote machine: Operation timed out
Apache/1.3.26 Server at tinderbox.perl.org Port 80
TIA,
leo
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[ mops timings ]
C -O3:277
BTW, same (probably alignment caused) timing diffs (gcc 2.95.2):
$ for i in $(seq 20); do ./mops; done
328.089625 M op/s
319.657445 M op/s
333.533456 M op/s
371.050336 M op/s
345.721672 M op/s
307.465496 M op/s
364.405245 M op/s
330.797305
Steve Fink wrote:
I don't really know a whole lot about this area, but I remember I was
surprised the first time I looked at this and discovered it was based
on pointers instead of offsets. I assumed there was some good reason
for it that I didn't know at the time (eg performance), but now I
doub
I don't really know a whole lot about this area, but I remember I was
surprised the first time I looked at this and discovered it was based
on pointers instead of offsets. I assumed there was some good reason
for it that I didn't know at the time (eg performance), but now I
doubt that. Your way see
