[perl #20804] [PATCH]-added inc by NN to core.ops

2003-02-09 Thread via RT
com/ -- attachment 1 -- url: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/attach/50634/38880/2f2dbf/core.ops.20030209.patch core.ops.20030209.patch Description: core.ops.20030209.patch

Re: [CVS ci] CGP - CGoto Prederefed runloop

2003-02-09 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jerome Vouillon wrote: On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:37:42PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: This is one thing I allways wanted to try ;-) fast_core MOps: 11 Prederef: 17.5 CGoto MOps: 19.4 CGP MOps: 27.5 CGP -O3 MOps: 65 !!!1 Why not also predereference the operation address

Re: Securing Parrot ASM

2003-02-09 Thread Kv Org
I see two different situations when permissions/capabilities are concerned: the first is when one tries to run untrusted code, modules or parts of code and needs some kind of sanboxing mechanism. Safe has been built with this situation in mind, mostly. The second is when one builds a perl system w

Re: [CVS ci] CGP - CGoto Prederefed runloop

2003-02-09 Thread Gopal V
If memory serves me right, Nicholas Clark wrote: > I had a (possibly) impractical idea - computed goto / JIT > (or even computed goto / prederef / jit) core > > I don't know whether this is possible: > > Inside a cgoto core have 1 extra op - enter JITted section. > > The bytecode is "compiled"