Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
Erm, my statement was actually just an assumption that the first op
would be a 'saveall' -- I haven't looked at actual imcc output.
imcc does not emit any additional instructions currently. This is why I
did start this thread in the first place.
- imcc takes the
Allen Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter == Peter Seibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, I'm new to this list and haven't had a chance to grovel
through the old archives yet so please forgive me for jumping in
in the middle of things.
Anyway, what about languages
During this change (recalculate BB and life info on the fly for spilled
regs) I encountered another problem with the INOUT ARG_DIR argument of
P-registers:
set P0, P1[2]
and similar instructions don't need, that P0 already exists at this
instruction. P0 is set to point to a PMC located in
hello,
Is it possible to have a program, which consists of multiple IMCC source files?
So, something like this: (pseudo code, don't know IMCC (yet))
-
/* File #1: */
...
call funcA
...
sub funcB(x)
/* do something */
end sub
...
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Phil Hassey wrote:
But with a processor with 16 registers (do such things exist?).
Parrot would be overflowing registers that it could have been using
in the JIT.
RISC processor have a lot of them. But before there are unused
processor registers, we will allocate P
# New Ticket Created by Jason Gloudon
# Please include the string: [perl #21457]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21457
Here are some additional ops for the sun4 jit, a bit of name juggling to use
And attributes are essentially member variables of objects, which you
can access as $obj.foo. Another possible description of
them might be
lvalue methods which never take arguments, and which fetch and store
class-specific pieces of data. Different classes may define their own
private
K Stol wrote:
hello,
Is it possible to have a program, which consists of multiple IMCC source files?
Not yet, directly.
As a workaround, other files can be .include-ed into main, at least from
now on, I have committed a change and a test for this.
Are there some kind of 'header'-like files?
Jason Gloudon (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Jason Gloudon
# Please include the string: [perl #21457]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21457
Here are some additional ops for the sun4 jit, a
Steve Peters (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Steve Peters
# Please include the string: [perl #21385]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21385
This patch eliminates compiler warnings generated when
Steve Peters (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Steve Peters
# Please include the string: [perl #21387]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21387
This patch is to stop compilier warnings in embed.c.
Steve Peters (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Steve Peters
# Please include the string: [perl #21389]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21389
This patch is to stop warnings from being generated
Steve Peters (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Steve Peters
# Please include the string: [perl #21386]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21386
This patch fixes compilier warnings generated when
At 7:36 PM -0500 3/3/03, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
Jason Gloudon wrote:
Piers Cawley wrote:
I think you're overlooking the restoreall done just before
the jump-no-save-returnaddress operation... I see two savealls
and two restorealls.
But with
Does a couroutine end? And how?
The current implementation jumps forth and back by the Binvoke opcode,
one is a call coroutine the other is a yield. There seems to be no
possibility, that the coroutine states, I'm finished now - with
possibly meaning don't call me again.
And from imcc's
-Original Message-
From: Leopold Toetsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does a couroutine end? And how?
The current implementation jumps forth and back by the Binvoke opcode,
one is a call coroutine the other is a yield. There seems to be no
possibility, that the coroutine states, I'm
In my ongoing quest to understand the possibilities (and possible
limitations) of parrot, here's another one. ;-)
How close a mapping can there be between regular (x86 in this example)
assembly (as generated by c-compilation) and pasm?
I can't figure out if the stack ops can approximate this
17 matches
Mail list logo
