Re: [perl #22864] [PATCH] Move ParrotIO to PMCs

2003-07-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Juergen Boemmels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But in t/pmc/io_2.pasm is a more nasty problem. The sweep 0 call does (sometimes) not trigger the destruction of the PMC containing the IO-Object, even though it is not connected to the root-set. In trace_system_areas the variable env is not

Re: [perl #22864] [PATCH] Move ParrotIO to PMCs

2003-07-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Juergen Boemmels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And here is the patch. Thanks, applied. leo

[CVS ci] runtime includes for parrot - 1

2003-07-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
I've put in a new Configure step that populates runtime/parrot/include with various .PASM files containing constant from all over parrot/include. The procedure to add a constants file is rather simple: - add the *.h (or *.c) file to config/gen/parrot_include.pl - surround your #define's or enum

Re: [perl #22864] [PATCH] Move ParrotIO to PMCs

2003-07-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Juergen Boemmels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... we still have a *big* problem here. During marking the system area, we might always detect stale objects and mark them live. This isn't a problem for plain objects, but objects that need timely destruction

Re: [perl #22864] [PATCH] Move ParrotIO to PMCs

2003-07-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote: more errors like this: t/op/interp_1.pasm and t/op/gc_1.t are the ones I know of. We will have much fun with bugs like this. This might be another one -- t/op/gc_2.pasm is simply interpinfo I1, 2 # How many DOD runs have we done already?

[perl #22873] gentoo ebuild ... problem..

2003-07-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by raptor # Please include the string: [perl #22873] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=22873 hi there, I'm just tring to make a parrot ebuild for Gentoo linux but one thing bugs me

Re: [perl #22873] gentoo ebuild ... problem..

2003-07-03 Thread Leon Brocard
raptor sent the following bits through the ether: As u may see the problem is when docs-generation is done ... the perldoc -U has to be used in docs/Makefile so the generation pass successfully.. At the moment it is perldoc -u Could u correct this thanx alot in advance. Thanks for the

Re: This week's summary

2003-07-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:11 AM +0100 7/3/03, Alan Burlison wrote: Dan Sugalski wrote: I'm pretty sure the POSIX docs say that you can't call mutex routines from within interrupt code, which makes sense--the last thing you want is for an interrupt handler to block on a mutex aquisition. I haven't got a copy, but

Re: This week's summary

2003-07-03 Thread Alan Burlison
Dan Sugalski wrote: The more I think about this the more I want to punt on the whole idea. Cross-platform async IO is just one big swamp. Agreed. Glug, glug, glug ;-) -- Alan Burlison --

async i/o (was Re: This week's summary)

2003-07-03 Thread Uri Guttman
AB == Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AB Dan Sugalski wrote: The more I think about this the more I want to punt on the whole idea. Cross-platform async IO is just one big swamp. AB Agreed. Glug, glug, glug ;-) who here will be at oscon (or yapc::eu)? i would like to get

Re: async i/o (was Re: This week's summary)

2003-07-03 Thread Alan Burlison
Uri Guttman wrote: who here will be at oscon (or yapc::eu)? i would like to get a small BOF going on this subject. i agree it is a morass but i have some ideas and i know dan has plenty. but we had better learn to swim these swamps and not get eaten by the gators. we can drain them, convert them

Re: async i/o (was Re: This week's summary)

2003-07-03 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 05:10:23PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: AB == Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AB Dan Sugalski wrote: The more I think about this the more I want to punt on the whole idea. Cross-platform async IO is just one big swamp. AB Agreed. Glug, glug,

yapc::eu Parrot BOF

2003-07-03 Thread Stéphane Payrard
Brian Ingerson and Éric Cholet have kindly set up a k?wiki for yapc::eu. There will be a BOF Saturday July 26 starting a 10 pm and probably running until 13pm. I have created an entry for the Parrot BOF. It's up to you to add material, like the issues you want to be discussed.

Stupid Parrot Tricks

2003-07-03 Thread Clinton Pierce
Prompted by a comment in gnat's journal on use.perl.org, I present: Parrot BASIC CGI http://www.camfriends.org/testform.html Let the fun begin. :)

Re: async i/o

2003-07-03 Thread Uri Guttman
TB == Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: TB On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 05:10:23PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: AB == Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AB Dan Sugalski wrote: The more I think about this the more I want to punt on the whole idea. Cross-platform async IO is

Re: async i/o

2003-07-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:17 PM -0400 7/3/03, Uri Guttman wrote: TB == Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: TB On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 05:10:23PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: AB == Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AB Dan Sugalski wrote: The more I think about this the more I want to punt on the

Re: yapc::eu Parrot BOF

2003-07-03 Thread Uri Guttman
SP == Stéphane Payrard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SP Brian Ingerson and Éric Cholet have kindly set up a k?wiki for SP yapc::eu. There will be a BOF Saturday July 26 starting a 10 pm SP and probably running until 13pm. hmm, that is probably a tourist day for my wife and i. we could just

yapc::eu Parrot BOF

2003-07-03 Thread Stéphane Payrard
Bcc: Subject: Re: yapc::eu Parrot BOF Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:26:10PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 12:12 AM +0200 7/4/03, Stéphane Payrard wrote: Brian Ingerson and Éric Cholet have kindly set up a k?wiki for yapc::eu. There will

Re: async i/o

2003-07-03 Thread Uri Guttman
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DS At 6:17 PM -0400 7/3/03, Uri Guttman wrote: TB == Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: TB Has any other language learnt to swim well in these swamps? none that i have heard of can swim all swamps. we could be pioneers here! they may

Lazy Arrays

2003-07-03 Thread Luke Palmer
I'd like to go about implementing [Perl]?LazyArray and LazySequence pmcs, possibly with a TiedArray (and Infinity) in the interim. I have a few semantic questions, but first, here's what I have in mind: LazySequence: Manages individual lazy sequences like 1..Inf (or

Re: [perl #22864] [PATCH] Move ParrotIO to PMCs

2003-07-03 Thread Benjamin Goldberg
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote: more errors like this: t/op/interp_1.pasm and t/op/gc_1.t are the ones I know of. We will have much fun with bugs like this. This might be another one -- t/op/gc_2.pasm is

Re: Stupid Parrot Tricks

2003-07-03 Thread Robert Spier
At Thu, 3 Jul 2003 18:16:45 -0400, Clinton Pierce wrote: Parrot BASIC CGI http://www.camfriends.org/testform.html Let the fun begin. :) Maybe it is time to play with mod_parrot again! -R

wxWindows Support

2003-07-03 Thread David
There was a recent mention on the wxWindows* list that pairing it with Parrot would be a good combination. Is there any interest in supporting wxWindows in Parrot? Thanks. -- David Cuny *: For those not familiar with it, wxWindows (http://www.wxwindows.org) is an open source, cross-platform

Re: Lazy Arrays

2003-07-03 Thread Benjamin Goldberg
Luke Palmer wrote: I'd like to go about implementing [Perl]?LazyArray and LazySequence pmcs, possibly with a TiedArray (and Infinity) in the interim. I have a few semantic questions, but first, here's what I have in mind: LazySequence: Manages individual lazy sequences like 1..Inf