Re: Tinderboxens

Sorry for the late response, I've been out of town and it took me a while to catch up on p6i. On 7/18/03 8:36 PM, "Joshua Hoblitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] >> it's got some error identification issues, This is something I plan to work on more, the regexps that define sucuess/failure (in

Re: Small perl task for the interested

Josh Wilmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> .c$(O) : >> $(PERL) tools/dev/cc_flags.pl $(CC) $(CFLAGS) ${cc_o_out}$@ -c $< > > I would go a bit further, and create a tools/build/compile, tools/build/ > link_executable, tools/build/link_library, etc. > > Take all the flags out of the makefile

Re: [perl #23027] [PATCH] Per-c-file flag handling in make

At 8:26 PM + 7/17/03, Lars Balker Rasmussen (via RT) wrote: I've added a way to add or remove options on a per-c-file basis. Right now all it does is make sure that tsq.c won't be affected by Configure.pl --optimize, and that the amounts of silly warnings is reduced (by removing -Wformat-nonli

[perl #23076] Parrot Array

# New Ticket Created by Andy Bussey # Please include the string: [perl #23076] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23076 > I assume it should be possible to push something on to an empty Array, but it doesn't wor

Memory system questions

Hello, While reworking the IO-system I get deeper in the memory system than I wanted to. So I have some questions: * Is there a way to trace only a part of the rootset? pobject_lives only adds an element to the root-set. But creation of the rootset and tracing of PMCs are done (as far as I ca

Re: [perl #23064] [PATCH] Fix copyright notices

On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 10:30 AM, Josh Wilmes (via RT) wrote: Here's a first pass, just changing any existing "when this is determined" or YAS messages to TPF. I won't apply this one myself as I lack the legal experience to understand whether it is properly done. It's passed muster at the

Re: Events

At 1:09 PM -0400 7/20/03, Michal Wallace wrote: On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote: >It would be entirely possible for Parrot (or a Parrot library) to >use AIO at a low level, without introducing interrupts to the VM layer. Sure. But what'd be the point? Adding in interrupts allows a numb

Re: The Perl 6 Summary

Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:20:26PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: >> Acknowledgements, Announcements and Apologies >> First of all, I plead insanity for my mistake of last week's summary. >> PONIE does not stand for 'Perl On New Internal Architecture',

Re: The Perl 6 Summary

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:20:26PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > Acknowledgements, Announcements and Apologies > First of all, I plead insanity for my mistake of last week's summary. > PONIE does not stand for 'Perl On New Internal Architecture', it > obviously stands for 'Perl On New Im

The Perl 6 Summary

Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20030720 Welcome back to an interim Perl 6 Summary, falling as it does between two conference weeks; OSCON and YAPC::Europe. For reasons involving insanity, a EuroStar ticket going begging, and undeserved generosity I shall be bringing my conferenc

Re: Abbreviation

Vladimir Lipskiy wrote: In /parrot/docs/jit.pod: "For moving registers from processor to parrot and vv, the B functions have to be implemented." what does "vv" stand for? vice versa (from processor to parrot and back) leo

Re: Abbreviation

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:28:26AM +0300, Vladimir Lipskiy wrote: > In /parrot/docs/jit.pod: > > "For moving registers from processor to parrot and vv, the > B functions have to be implemented." > > what does "vv" stand for? Vice versa, I presume. -- Lars Balker Rasmussen

Re: [WIP PATCH] core.ops split-up

"Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway, a corrected patch that fixes the trans.t errors is up at > . Uh, there's still no "+inline op sin" in that file? > If it doesn't > apply the first time, try splitting the patch into several