# New Ticket Created by "Arcady Goldmints"
# Please include the string: [perl #23115]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23115 >
Contrary to popular belief, linux does run on things other than x86, and people wi
K Stol wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michal Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:48 PM
> Subject: approaching python
>
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've been thinking about the "compiling python to
> > parrot" concept. Right now
What kind of semantics do we want for perl6, if we have:
my $fh1 = fdopen( $n );
do {
my $fh2 = fdopen( $n );
};
# is $fh1 valid or not at this point?
For that matter, what about:
for(1..2) {
my $fh = fdopen( $n ); # does this succed the second time?
}
Should thes
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:41:25PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> First, to get it out of the way, I don't have to convince you of
> anything. You have to convince me. For better or worse I'm
> responsible for the design and its ultimately my decision. If you
> don't want async IO, it's time to ma
Luke Palmer wrote:
>Klass-Jan Stol writes:
>
>>>The thing is, I don't have a lot of experience when it comes to
>>>compilers, but I do know a whole lot about python. :) If this
>>>approach makes sense, is there someone with IMCC experience who'd
>>>be willing to do some virtual pair programming wi
It now builds and tests fine.
Simon
On Thursday 24 July 2003 16:13, Simon Glover wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 July 2003 15:55, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
> > > Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01
> >
> > 00
> > --
> > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >
> > > OS/ABI:UNIX - Sy
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
> On Thursday 24 July 2003 15:55, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
> > Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01
> 00
> --
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>
> > OS/ABI:UNIX - System V
>
> Patch is in, please resync and try it.
>
It's now dieing
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the Python bytecode spec (to be a little more
> accurate, I'm completely clueless about it), but perhaps something
> similar can be done? Also, another thing to consider is that it
> might be easier to translate python bytecode d
On Thursday 24 July 2003 15:55, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
> Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01
00
--
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> OS/ABI:UNIX - System V
Patch is in, please resync and try it.
> boe
Daniel
On 24 Jul 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Klass-Jan Stol writes:
> > module, right? I don't know Python, and I've a little experience
> > with IMC, but it seems to me only a new code generator module should
...[snip]
> Well... sortof. It's definitely going to take writing a whole new
> code generato
Daniel Grunblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 24 July 2003 15:14, Simon Glover wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
> > > I have checked in a first attempt to make parrot generate an executable.
> > >
> > > It works fine on x86 - OpenBSD/linux/FreeBSD and should als
On Thursday 24 July 2003 15:48, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
> Daniel Grunblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have checked in a first attempt to make parrot generate an executable.
>
> This is very cool.
Thanks.
>
> > It works fine on x86 - OpenBSD/linux/FreeBSD and should also work on
> > NetBSD
>
On Thursday 24 July 2003 15:14, Simon Glover wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
> > I have checked in a first attempt to make parrot generate an executable.
> >
> > It works fine on x86 - OpenBSD/linux/FreeBSD and should also work on
> > NetBSD
>
> It's not working for me on Lin
Index: exec.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/exec.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 exec.c
--- exec.c 24 Jul 2003 17:18:30 - 1.1
+++ exec.c 24 Jul 2003 18:45:22 -
@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@
*/
#include
-#include
+#if HA
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
> I have checked in a first attempt to make parrot generate an executable.
>
> It works fine on x86 - OpenBSD/linux/FreeBSD and should also work on NetBSD
It's not working for me on Linux/x86 -- the build is failing with:
In file included from exe
I have checked in a first attempt to make parrot generate an executable.
It works fine on x86 - OpenBSD/linux/FreeBSD and should also work on NetBSD
For PPC (Darwin) it generates code correctly just for programs that use *only*
fully jitted opcodes.
It should work with or without JIT_CGP.
Afte
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Test number 6 in io.t is failing on a number of the tinderboxes with
> a double-free error.
>
> Test 6 does this:
>
> open P0, "temp.file", "<"
> clone P1, P0
> read S0, P1, 1024
> print S0
> end
>
> And the clone function in th
Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
>> However, now the 4th test fails on Solaris (and most likely other OS's
>> witout setenv/unsetenv). This is because the test relies on a key
>> disappearing from %ENV when it's been unsetenv'ed - this doesn't
>> happen
to link with python, we should probably write our own parser.[1]
Just use Perl 6 to write it :). Ooops... looks like a chicken-and-egg
problem...
Greetings,
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Luke Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 2:22 AM
Subject: Re: approaching python
> Klass-Jan Stol writes:
> > > The thing is, I don't have a lot of experience when it co
Klass-Jan Stol writes:
> > The thing is, I don't have a lot of experience when it comes to
> > compilers, but I do know a whole lot about python. :) If this
> > approach makes sense, is there someone with IMCC experience who'd
> > be willing to do some virtual pair programming with me and spike
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Michal Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:48 PM
Subject: approaching python
>
> Hey all,
>
> I've been thinking about the "compiling python to
> parrot" concept. Right now it looks like the
> approach is to st
From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> We are going to do all I/O under the hood asynchronously.
> Completed async IO puts an event in the event queue...
I am new to parrot, but I've had plenty of experience with (non-unix)
I/O systems. Having a totally async core in Parrot is pretty clea
24 matches
Mail list logo
