Hey all,
Python objects can have things "in" them:
foo["x"] = "in"
... and it can also have things "on" them:
foo.x = "on"
I noticed lua treats these as the same thing
and got curious about the distinction in IMCC.
Coding it this way seems to work, but I'm
not sure I really understood t
I was recently reading the following:
http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/dev/infant.dev.html
It's missing some things. One of which is the (currently used?) way of
preventing infant mortality: anchor right away, or else turn off DoD
until the new object isn't needed.
This document doesn't mentio
Considering that parrot is now emitting an executable (on some
platforms)... and IIRC, C will be one of the languages we plan to have
parrot support for... will parrot be able to compile itself? :)
--
$a=24;split//,240513;s/\B/ => /for@@=qw(ac ab bc ba cb ca
);{push(@b,$a),($a-=6)^=1 for 2..$a/6
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Also, although we're told at the top of string.c to not look at
> > s->bufstart or s->buflen, I'd like to know if we are allowed to
> > assume/assert that for all strings, the following is true:
>
> >s->encoding-
Luke Palmer wrote:
>
> Benjamin Golberg writes:
> > Actually, these are mostly questions about the string_str_index
> > function.
>
> Uh oh...
>
> > I've some questions about bufstart, strstart, bufused, strlen and
> > encoding->characters?
> >
> > In string_str_index_multibyte, the lastmatch
Q1: Suppose I have the following call into a sub named "foo":
foo($var1, $var2, $var3);
What should I set in I1? Is it 3?
And here:
foo($var1, @arr2, %hash3);
Is it still 3, since these aren't gonna be flattened?
Q2: I'm calling without prototyping
foo($var1, $var2, $var3, ... , $var23);
He
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 19:25, Michal Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, K Stol wrote:
> Really, there's a ton of overlap between the various
> "high level" languages that parrot wants to support.
> Maybe we could put together a generic code generator
> that everyone could use? Obviously, it would hav
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
> On Sunday 03 August 2003 15:27, Simon Glover wrote:
> > On 3 Aug 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > > This fix has worked fine with JIT until now, so I suspect the problem
> > > is elsewhere.
> >
> > Bug confirmed here (although I need a slightly longer st
On Sunday 03 August 2003 15:27, Simon Glover wrote:
> On 3 Aug 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > This fix has worked fine with JIT until now, so I suspect the problem
> > is elsewhere.
>
> Bug confirmed here (although I need a slightly longer string to trigger
> it). Here's a stacktrace:
I couldn't r
On 3 Aug 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> This fix has worked fine with JIT until now, so I suspect the problem
> is elsewhere.
>
Bug confirmed here (although I need a slightly longer string to trigger
it). Here's a stacktrace:
--
(or something)
The following program segfaults when run under JIT.
.sub _main
newsub P0, .Sub, _echo
$S0 = "abcdefghij"
savetop
restoretop
end
.end
.sub _echo
print P5
invoke P1
.end
(note that I never call _echo, but th
Is this supposed to happen?
% parrot -
.sub _main
$S0 = "Hello\n"
$S1 = $S0
substr $S1, 2, 2, ""
print $S0
print $S1
end
.end
(EOF)
Heo
Heo
Aren't strings supposed to follow value semantics?
Luke
Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, although we're told at the top of string.c to not look at
> s->bufstart or s->buflen, I'd like to know if we are allowed to
> assume/assert that for all strings, the following is true:
>s->encoding->skip_forward( s->strstart, s->strlen ) ==
Vladimir Lipskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are "-", "X", and " "(whitespace) supossed to mean there?
"X" is meaning "is in context". Sorry if that is misleading, I'll update
the pod.
> Why is Eval not there? Does it have no context?
Its not specified yet, how eval fits into the picture.
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, K Stol wrote:
> At this moment, I'm looking at a new version of Lua, the previous
> 'pirate' compiled (well, sort of :-) Lua 4 Lua 5 has some features,
> such as coroutines (If I remembered well) and all kinds of neat
> stuff for which Parrot has built-in support (and it droppe
- Original Message -
From: "Michal Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "K Stol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 2:25 AM
Subject: generic code generator? [was: subroutines and python status]
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, K Stol wrote:
>
> > > From: "Leon Bro
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, K Stol wrote:
> > From: "Leon Brocard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
> > I don't like things becoming dead-ends. How much work do you think
> > it'd be to extend it some more and update it to latest Lua?
...
> 2: I misdesigned the code generator; that is, at the point where I
> could
Brent Dax wrote:
> Honestly, though, I'm no longer sure the full regex engine is a good idea.
> A fast index op, a fast ord op, a character class op, and the intstack is
> really all that's needed to make a regex engine from plain Parrot opcodes.
I agree with you on one level. That is enough to m
Benjamin Goldberg:
> Since I don't see anything to save/restore the instack on subroutine
> calls, I am wondering what happens if a regex has a (?{ CODE }), and
> that CODE calls a regex. Are we garunteed that after a regex completes
> (either succeeds or fails) that the intstack is in the same st
19 matches
Mail list logo
