Re: Packfile stuff

2003-08-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Simon Glover wrote: At 12:18 PM +0200 8/5/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: First: any changes here imply, that assemble.pl/disassemble.pl will seeze to work. Well, there's disassemble.c, which pdb uses; does that do everything that you want? All packfile.c based utilities are fine, as disassemble.

Re: generic code generator? [was: subroutines and python status]

2003-08-05 Thread Michal Wallace
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Stephen Thorne wrote: > > It seems to me that if we want to maximize the > > number of languages using it, the generic > > compiler shouldn't depend on anything but > > C and parrot... But until we get it working, > > I'd like to stick to a dynamic language like > > python/perl

Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-05 Thread Jonathan Worthington
On Tuesday, August 05 at 2003 2:40 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 12:12 AM -0400 8/5/03, Melvin Smith wrote: > >At 11:37 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Brent Dax wrote: > >>Jonathan Worthington: > >>> work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean precompiled > >>> binaries, not yet. Parrot is sti

Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-05 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:12 AM -0400 8/5/03, Melvin Smith wrote: At 11:37 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Brent Dax wrote: Jonathan Worthington: work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean precompiled binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under development, so we aren't shipping binaries.", so I'm guessing maybe I

Re: generic code generator? [was: subroutines and python status]

2003-08-05 Thread Michal Wallace
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, K Stol wrote: > > What do you think? Want to try squishing pirate/python > > and pirate/lua together? :) > > Yeah, I like the idea. Let's try this out. Well, I finished reading your report[1] and posted some of my (rather unorganized) thoughts up at [2] It does seem like t

Re: Packfile stuff

2003-08-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's some stuff we need to add to the packfile format and the sub > header to get things ready for more language work. First: any changes here imply, that assemble.pl/disassemble.pl will seeze to work. So first step would be: grep the tree and remove all

Re: Infant mortality

2003-08-05 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, I meant generation set to MAX_INT, not 0. > > Marking pmcs as free happens at the end of DOD. Marking pmcs as live or > dead happens earlier. I was thinking of something like: > >foreach(pmc in all_pmcs) { ... >} >fo