clean checkout on Win2K

All~ I just ran a completely clean checkout, configure, nmake, nmake test on Win2K. It passed most tests and had fewer warning then previously. Here are the errors that did occur... Hope someone finds this useful, Matt During perl Configure.pl ::snip:: Determining your minimum pointer alignme

Re: [perl #24329] Testing error sys/socket.h for FreeBSD.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:55:49AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Nick Kostirya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Otherwise, it would be necessary to introduce the idea of 'headers that > > are > > required for testing a header'. > > After a test you have the result in $PConfig{whatever}, so yo

[perl #24576] Some new targets in makefiles/root.in

# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer # Please include the string: [perl #24576] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24576 > Hi, this patch introduces a couple of new targets in parrot/Makefile. I not

Re: probing for inline

Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering whether it would be feasible to replace macros (some, most > or even all) conditionally with inline functions if the inline keyword is > available. AFAIK the only place where macros are widely used is jit_emit.h. I'm not aware of other m

Re: Why are .sub and compilation unit one and the same thing?

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:17:11 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If you have some small specialized subs, you can always put these inside >.emit/.eom as PASM. > I'll ditch imc then and just use pasm for everything, Thanks, Pete