On May 24, 2004, at 15.20, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Event Ops
=
The opcodes in this section are a combination of event requests and
event handling ops. It doesn't include the IO ops--those are separate.
Most of the event request ops have two forms, one of which takes a
callback PMC and user d
On May 26, 2004, at 2:02 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 07:48:32PM -0700, Jeff Clites wrote:
On May 25, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Yup. UTF8 is Just another variable-width encoding. Do anything with
it
and we convert it to a fixed-width encoding, in this case UTF32.
At 4:54 PM +0200 5/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Piers Cawley wrote:
But under this scheme, the implementing function will have to do a
saveall for every function it calls because it doesn't know what
registers its caller cares about. And you're almost certainly going
to want to call other function
Please take me off your mailing list. I don't know how you got my address,
but I have no idea what you are talking about. Mrs. Yardley address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "The Perl 6 Summarizer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL
Piers Cawley wrote:
But under this scheme, the implementing function will have to do a
saveall for every function it calls because it doesn't know what
registers its caller cares about. And you're almost certainly going
to want to call other functions to do the heavy lifting for all the
usual reaso
The Perl 6 Summary for the fortnight ending 2004-05-23
Yes. I know. This week's summary is a week late. So it's a summary of
the last two weeks. So let's get straight to perl6-internals shall we?
Working on the Perl 6 Compiler
Abhijit A. Mahabal posted his first ever patch, which upd
Hi,
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 14:27, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The code is now working as expected.
>
> Not quite. Running PBCs that e.g. C<.include "file"> don't work
> any more[1].
> There are packfile issues now due to the changed execution order.
Oops, s
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code is now working as expected.
Not quite. Running PBCs that e.g. C<.include "file"> don't work
any more[1].
There are packfile issues now due to the changed execution order.
Until this is resolved I'd vote for still disabling _PARROTLIB.
leo
[1] ma
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [ calculating registers to save ]
>
>>> ... once per sub per location where the sub is called from. But there
>>> isn't any knowledge that a sub might be called.
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 07:48:32PM -0700, Jeff Clites wrote:
> On May 25, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >Yup. UTF8 is Just another variable-width encoding. Do anything with it
> >and we convert it to a fixed-width encoding, in this case UTF32.
>
> This has the unfortunate side-effect
10 matches
Mail list logo
