This might be useful... (thanks planetlisp!)
Chris Double
Wed Jun 30 17:22:09 2004
http://radio.weblogs.com/0102385/2004/07/01.html#a625
I came across a free portable arbitary precision integer and rational
arithmentic library called [1]IMath that looks useful. It is
Ion Alexandru Morega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would certainly work that way, but there are advantages in including
the source code:
- We could trim down all the functionality we don't use (if there is
any)
No. Please not another library (like ICU), which we have to update in
our tree
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Ion, don't forget to send in a patch to the CREDITS
file.
$ grep -1 Ion CREDITS
N: Ion Alexandru Morega
D: string.pmc
Thanks again for your summary,
leo
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. Nor, if the freeze/thaw system is representation-neutral, as a
plugin option for parrot itself. There are just some license issues (or
I'm reading it wrong, which is an issue itself :) that make shipping GMP
with parrot problematic.
Isn't it
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I'm now thinking that we want to do mmd for assignment. Dammit. :(
Don't think so. We need, ehem, probably, set_complex, get_complex and so
on vtables. Complex is a basic type like integer, number, or bignum.
def main():
i = complex(2 + 1j)
Ion Alexandru Morega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the new classes/complex.pmc, tests included. It supports string
parsing (in the form a + bi, see the docs for more), string-keyed
access to real and imag and simple numerical operations.
Whee, great, thaks - applied.
... However,
the
Robert Spier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This might be useful... (thanks planetlisp!)
I came across a free portable arbitary precision integer and rational
arithmentic library called [1]IMath that looks useful. It is under a
BSD style license and it looks like it might be
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
No. Please not another library (like ICU), which we have to update in
our tree as well. I'd like to just link against it, *if* the library is
selected with Configure.
Agreed. This reminds me of the situation we faced in perl5 with database
libraries.
# New Ticket Created by Dennis Rieks
# Please include the string: [perl #30557]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30557
On Saturday 26 June 2004 16:44, Nicholas Clark wrote:
cvsuser 04/06/26
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #30560]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30560
The Solaris compiler complained when classes/complex.c tried to return a
value
Sorry I already deleted the mail from Andy that triggered my attention
He was summarizing the different DB options as of the perl5 perspective
There is also a rather new version available: QDBM
It got me confused because the HP porting center has put a prcompiled version
for HP-UX on their
It'll appear shortly at your local mirror. You can get it from my web
site as well.
I'll be writing an extension module tomorrow, and starting next week, I'll
get started on Regexp::Perl6.
Which leads me to a question about Perl 6 regexes. I'm writing an article
on (?{ ... }) and (??{ ... })
Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan writes:
It'll appear shortly at your local mirror. You can get it from my web
site as well.
I'll be writing an extension module tomorrow, and starting next week, I'll
get started on Regexp::Perl6.
Cool.
Which leads me to a question about Perl 6 regexes. I'm writing
Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
...I have a question about the backtrack
control assertions : :: and :::.
Do any of them cause the regex to fail entirely? That is, not fail and
try again from a different position in the string, but fail utterly? My
understanding is they don't, which is why there's
14 matches
Mail list logo
