# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #30613]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30613 >
Hi,
this is just a minor update of Parrot m4. There are no new features.
Th
At 8:57 PM +0200 7/6/04, Matija Papec wrote:
Would there be a way to still use simple unquoted hash keys like in
old days ($hash{MYKEY})?
imho %hash<> at first sight resembles alien ship from
Independence day. :)
You'll need to ask that over on perl6-language. For us, well, it's
syntax, and we
Would there be a way to still use simple unquoted hash keys like in old
days ($hash{MYKEY})?
imho %hash<> at first sight resembles alien ship from
Independence day. :)
At 8:21 PM +0200 7/6/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cvsuser 04/07/06 09:57:07
Modified:ops debug.ops
Log:
add in a die() op to just flat-out die. Right now. Calls the _exit
function, and it doesn't get a whole lot more fatal than that.
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cvsuser 04/07/06 09:57:07
> Modified:ops debug.ops
> Log:
> add in a die() op to just flat-out die. Right now. Calls the _exit
> function, and it doesn't get a whole lot more fatal than that.
Couldn't that be wrapped into the C opcod
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:42 AM +0200 7/1/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Probably. More a set_imaginary than set_compex, though. I don't think
that's needed as such for the benchmark, though. (And should it take a
BIGNUM or a NUMVAL?)
NUMVAL. But for now, I'm using strings, which works fine. Too less
At 8:42 AM +0200 7/1/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And I'm now thinking that we want to do mmd for assignment. Dammit. :(
Don't think so. We need, ehem, probably, set_complex, get_complex and so
on vtables. Complex is a basic type like integer, number, or bignu
--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 6:21 AM -0700 7/6/04, Austin Hastings wrote:
> >--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> we need a Perl 6 pumpking,
> >
> >Luke Palmer.
>
> No fair volunteering other people,
Don't think of it as "volunteering other people" so much as "pop
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 19:27, Dan Sugalski wrote:
UNARY_NEGATIVE: restore $Px; new $Py, Undef; $Py = $Px * -1; save $Py |
$Px = -1 * $Px
Wouldn't something this do what is desired? I'm just guessing, though.
Brian
--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we need a Perl 6 pumpking,
Luke Palmer.
At 8:46 AM +0200 7/1/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope. Nor, if the freeze/thaw system is representation-neutral, as a
plugin option for parrot itself. There are just some license issues (or
I'm reading it wrong, which is an issue itself :) that make shippin
At 9:56 PM +0200 7/5/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Where is Python::Bytecode and where is Dan?
I mailed you a copy, but I'll resend and put it up for http fetch in
a little bit. I'm back, finally, after weeks of dead hardware doing
the repair shuffle and a few days of vacation. (My wife takes the
"
At 6:21 AM -0700 7/6/04, Austin Hastings wrote:
--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we need a Perl 6 pumpking,
Luke Palmer.
No fair volunteering other people, though I'd be happy to forward
*your* volunteering on to Allison... :-P
--
Dan
--it's lik
Or at least lay on more. Here's the scoop--we need a Perl 6 pumpking,
someone to take on the responsibility of making the Perl 6 compiler
happen. When we started this whole process these many years ago, we
though having one person handle the software end of things was
sufficient, but making perl 6
# New Ticket Created by Dennis Rieks
# Please include the string: [perl #30604]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30604 >
Hi,
make test fails again, now in t\pmc\complex:
--8<--
15 matches
Mail list logo
