Perl 6 Summary for 2005-01-18 through 2005-01-31
All~
Welcome to another double feature summary. Sadly, this one was delayed
because of an argument that I was/am having with my connection.
Fortunately, a generous neighbor has allowed me to use his connection
for the time being.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:48:22 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any reason to keep lib/Make.pm around?
>
> No, AFAIK.
Since no one has said anything to the contrary, would someone remove
it? Then I'll close the appropriate ti
> The recent gdbmhash configure check causes the following output on my
> system during the build.
I have changed dynclasses.in to use the CONDITIONED_LINE hack. So there
is no longer a need to access a potentially undefined config value.
A patch is attached.
> runtime/parrot/include...
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> ... But that doesn't
>> work fur user methods, especially if there is no indication that a user
>> function is used as a method in the first place.
>>
>> def find(s, sub):
>> ...
> In Python, this is statically determinable. I
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>
>> Not quite. It's just:
>>
>> f = getattribute Parrot_string, "find"
>>
>> nothing more. The C vtable has to do the right thing, i.e.
>> if the attribute is a callable, it has to return a bound method object.
> Exactly.
[ I've che
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
WRT functionality: for a call it has to shift up PMC arguments and
insert the object as P5, right?
At the moment, it contains this logic. My plans are to remove the
shifting and set the object into P2 / INTERP->ctx
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:02:16 -0800, via RT Matt Diephouse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
> # Please include the string: [perl #33171]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=33
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[ provide Bound_Meth core PMC classes ]
> Cool. I'd likely still subclass it to provide a get_string.
Yep.
>> WRT implementation: I'd like to swap struct_val/pmc_val for all Sub
>> classes. It's just cleaner but should be almost full
# New Ticket Created by FranÃois PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #34002]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34002 >
All instances of ParrotIOLayerAPI could be declared as 'const' in the IO
subsystem
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> WRT functionality: for a call it has to shift up PMC arguments and
>> insert the object as P5, right?
> At the moment, it contains this logic. My plans are to remove the
> shifting and set the object into P2 / INTERP->ctx.current_ob
Will Coleda via RT wrote:
According to our records, your request regarding
"[BUG] missing Makefile dependencies"
has been resolved.
No, isn't resolved. At least there isn't any rule, which changes need
which level of "make *clean". Changes to classes/* comes to my mind.
leo
11 matches
Mail list logo
