After a little research I have found why Configure.pl succeeds while
determining if some FreeBSDs (like 4.9, 4.10) supports GMP and why
compilation fails in the same systems complaining about undefined
references to `mpz_fits_slong_p'.
The test about GMP support is at:
config/auto/gmp.pl
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I read that you can provide support (in Perl 6) for most languages that
> parsers have been written for. As it appears to me, however, the languages
> that you are mainly interested in are substitutes (competitors) to Perl.
You're mista
I read that you can provide support (in Perl 6) for most languages that
parsers have been written for. As it appears to me, however, the languages
that you are mainly interested in are substitutes (competitors) to Perl.
Also, you might include languages that are complementary to Perl. I
fig
Dear all,
to my knowledge, there is no native interface to GNU R in Perl 5.
Apparently, having such an interface saves some pain in statistical
analyses. My current solution to extend Perl towards R is to start
an R process, and to feed its stdin to produce the stuff I want. However,
starting R
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Matt Fowles wrote:
pipe dreams
Juerd wondered if he could mix = and ==> in a sane way. The answer
appears to be no. Once you bring in ==> you should stick with it.
Huh?!? It doesn't seem to me that the answer is 'no'. In fact C<< ==> >>
is supposed to be yet another ope
