Re: [perl #34549] t/op/trans.t failure on OpenBSD

2005-03-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Steve Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:00:45PM -, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote: >> >> atan N4, -0.0, -0.0 >> >> Obviously another broken C system. What says your perl: >> >> $ perl -le'print atan2(-0.0,-0.0)' >> -3.14159265358979324 >> > Tasty :-/ > On OpenBSD,

Re: Just an anouncement

2005-03-23 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:39:50PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > In the nest french perl workshop, I will explain why such a language is > > able to help us in our pedagogy. > > If it's that workshop that runs in parallel with the Vienna one, then > we'll meet via live broadcast, hopeful

Re: [perl #34548] [TODO] Replace classes/pmc2c.pl with classes/pmc2c2.pl

2005-03-23 Thread Matt Fowles
All~ On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:19:09 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [mdiep - Di 22. Mär 2005, 14:35:02]: > >> > >> pmc2c2.pl is the new pmc2c.pl. Both currently exist in Parrot CVS. > >> Either pmc2c.pl should be delete

Re: [perl #34548] [TODO] Replace classes/pmc2c.pl with classes/pmc2c2.pl

2005-03-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [mdiep - Di 22. Mär 2005, 14:35:02]: >> >> pmc2c2.pl is the new pmc2c.pl. Both currently exist in Parrot CVS. >> Either pmc2c.pl should be deleted or pmc2c2.pl should be renamed to >> pmc2c.pl. > A better location might be 'build_tools/pmc2

Re: [perl #34539] [PATCH] t/pmc/integer.t - tests included

2005-03-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Steven Schubiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. >> These should be factored out into t/pmc/perl*.t. Thanks, applied #34539 - #34545. leo PS nitpicking: please provide just one patch, if it isn't too big. This simplifies applying. And always test y

Re: [perl #34549] t/op/trans.t failure on OpenBSD

2005-03-23 Thread Steve Peters
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:00:45PM -, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote: > Steve Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Steve Peters > > # Please include the string: [perl #34549] > > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > > # https://rt.perl.

Re: pugscc --runparrot -e "'Hello, Parrot'.say"

2005-03-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As of Pugs revision 1024, this works: > % pugscc --runparrot -e "'Hello, Parrot'.say" Wow. And with rev 2^10 :) > ... Parrot is > really much, much saner than I had hoped; it eeriely supports lots of > things needed by a Perl 6 implementation. I wo

Re: [perl #34483] [PATCH] Doc : Build with MinGW

2005-03-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > via RT François PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> # New Ticket Created by François PERRAD >> # Please include the string: [perl #34483] >> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. >> # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Displ

Re: Just an anouncement

2005-03-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In our university, teaching parrot assembly is effective. Great. Thanks for the update. > In the nest french perl workshop, I will explain why such a language is > able to help us in our pedagogy. If it's that workshop that runs in parallel with the Vienna one,

Re: [perl #34549] t/op/trans.t failure on OpenBSD

2005-03-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Steve Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Steve Peters > # Please include the string: [perl #34549] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34549 > > When running testing parrot-HEAD, I get

Calling scheme 2 (was: Fearless leadership...)

2005-03-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What design issues are crying for attention right now? I forgot another related issue in my previous mail. In Subject "Scope exit and timely destruction" I've written: > Given is a Perl snippet like: >{ > my $fh = IO::File->new; > $fh->

Call scheme (was: Fearless leadership...)

2005-03-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What design issues are crying for attention right now? The CPS (continuation passing style) call scheme has some still unsolved implications. There are mainly two issues: 1) correctness 2) speed I'd like to summarize mainly the correctness item. "Br

[perl #34545] [PATCH] t/pmc/random.t - tests included

2005-03-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34545] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34545 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

Re: Perl 6 Summary for 2005-03-07 through 2005-03-22

2005-03-23 Thread Miroslav Silovic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pugs too lazy Miroslav Silovic noticed that closing a file handle in pugs did not force all the thunks associated with the file. While this was a bug in pugs, it led to conversation about whether = should be lazy or eager. Larry thinks that it will be safer to

pugscc --runparrot -e "'Hello, Parrot'.say"

2005-03-23 Thread Autrijus Tang
(Cc'ing this post to p6i and p6l, as this is likely to concern folks from all three mailing lists.) As of Pugs revision 1024, this works: % pugscc --runparrot -e "'Hello, Parrot'.say" And yes, it does what you think it does. Pugs takes that Perl 6 source code, produce an AST, triggers the Co

[perl #34549] t/op/trans.t failure on OpenBSD

2005-03-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steve Peters # Please include the string: [perl #34549] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34549 > When running testing parrot-HEAD, I get a test failure in t/op/trans.t on OpenBSD. Ru

pugscc --runparrot -e "'Hello, Parrot'.say"

2005-03-23 Thread Autrijus Tang
(Cc'ing this post to p6i and p6l, as this is likely to concern folks from all three mailing lists.) As of Pugs revision 1024, this works: % pugscc --runparrot -e "'Hello, Parrot'.say" And yes, it does what you think it does. Pugs takes that Perl 6 source code, produce an AST, triggers the Co

[perl #34544] [PATCH] t/pmc/pmc.t - tests excluded

2005-03-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34544] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34544 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

[perl #34543] [PATCH] t/pmc/perlundef.t - tests included

2005-03-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34543] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34543 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

[perl #34542] [PATCH] t/pmc/perlnum.t - tests included

2005-03-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34542] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34542 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

[perl #34541] [PATCH] t/pmc/perlstring.t - tests included

2005-03-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34541] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34541 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

[perl #34540] [PATCH] t/pmc/perlint.t - tests included

2005-03-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34540] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34540 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

[perl #34539] [PATCH] t/pmc/integer.t - tests included

2005-03-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34539] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34539 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

Just an anouncement

2005-03-23 Thread chris
In our university, teaching parrot assembly is effective. For 3 weeks now, our students (2nd year) are trying to realize programs in parrot assembly and, for most of them, they really apreciate it. The general opinion is that it is very powerfull and easy to learn. In the nest french perl worksho