On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 04:44:52PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I had a look at the generated mandel.imc. Remarkable, how compact
> Parrot.hs is and what it already does.
Thanks. One of my remaining large TODOs before Pugs 6.2.0 is to
recode the evaluators in Template Haskell as Compile/Haskel
The tcl parser (lib/parse.imc) has been removed and migrated to a method in a
PMC.
(Anyone looking for a C task could go through and cleanup the parse method in
tclparser.pmc - it's basically copied directly from the assembler style with
many gotos, no loops, etc. If you make changes, just make
Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As of Pugs revision 1024, this works:
> % pugscc --runparrot -e "'Hello, Parrot'.say"
I had a look at the generated mandel.imc. Remarkable, how compact
Parrot.hs is and what it already does.
Some remarks:
1) s__z = s__t # mandel.imc:149
This
chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a specific reason these are comments and not POD?
Because there's a large amount of POD at the beginning of the file
that targets a different audience. In this instance, I've taken POD to
be documentation for PMC writers and comments to be for anyon
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 20:49 -0800, Matt Diephouse wrote:
> This patch (a) adds comments before each subroutine describing its
> parameters, its return values, and what it does,
Is there a specific reason these are comments and not POD?
-- c
