From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:57:55 +0200
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I was hoping for access to a lower-level mechanism. FWIW,
> Common Lisp is an example of a dynamic HLL that doesn't allow certain
> ops to be overload
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:30:21 +0200
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... If the prefix is disabled via
> PARROT_TEST, this fixes the immediate problem:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> PARROT_TEST=1 perl -Ilib t/dynclass/foo.t
>
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 13:56 -0800, Offer Kaye wrote:
> The attached patch fixes some small typos in overview.pod
Hm, I think this file is very out of date, but it's a good patch fixing
real typos and it's nice to close tickets early.
> This is my first patch, so if I'm doing anything wrong, ple
# New Ticket Created by Offer Kaye
# Please include the string: [perl #34618]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34618 >
Hi,
The attached patch fixes some small typos in overview.pod
This is my first patch, s
At 08:07 30/03/2005 +, you wrote:
François" PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- data.pl.orig 2005-02-21 11:56:08.0 +0100
> +++ data.pl 2005-03-19 11:53:30.0 +0100
^^^
Please provide one patch for #34605 and #34606, diffed from Parrot root
directory one direc
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:58:59PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Based on the wheat on IRC this evening, is this question/answer worth adding
> to the Parrot FAQ on parrotcode.org?
>
> Pugs is going great shakes - why not just toss Parrot and run Perl 6 on Pugs?
> [...]
Beyond all that, there is
# New Ticket Created by Peter Sinnott
# Please include the string: [perl #34617]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34617 >
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.4.27-ti1211
arch= i386-linux-thread-multi
cc= cc
--
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:58, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Based on the wheat on IRC this evening, is this question/answer worth adding
> to the Parrot FAQ on parrotcode.org?
>
> Pugs is going great shakes - why not just toss Parrot and run Perl 6 on Pugs?
>
> Autrijus Tang, the lead on the Pugs projec
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Based on the wheat on IRC this evening, is this question/answer worth adding
> to the Parrot FAQ on parrotcode.org?
>
> Pugs is going great shakes - why not just toss Parrot and run Perl 6 on Pugs?
[snipped long response]
and let's not forget bytecode
Based on the wheat on IRC this evening, is this question/answer worth adding
to the Parrot FAQ on parrotcode.org?
Pugs is going great shakes - why not just toss Parrot and run Perl 6 on Pugs?
Autrijus Tang, the lead on the Pugs project, notes that an *unoptimised*
Parrot is already 30% faster tha
F currently fails on Windows. The reason is that the
test expects the exit code in the higher byte of the termination
status. In other words:
set S1, 'perl -e "exit(123)"'
set I1, 99
spawnw I1, S1
shr I2, I1, 8
print "return code: "
p
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:11:51AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +void freeze(visit_info *info) {
> > +IMAGE_IO *io = info->image_io;
> > +io->vtable->push_integer(INTERP, io, PMC_int_val(SELF));
> > +STRING *
Please have a look at the tests in t/pmc/mmd.t
More tests welcome,
Thanks,
leo
In the following snippet (from t/pmc/mmd.t) the two function calls
dispatch to the correct subroutine:
.namespace ["main"]
.sub main @MAIN
p("ok 1\n")
p("-twice", "ok 2\n")
.end
.namespace [""]
.sub p @MULTI(string)
...
.sub p @MULTI(string, string)
* the two multi subs "p" in the same na
14 matches
Mail list logo
