From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 08:42:53 +0200
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> . . .
>$ python
>>>> 1+2j
>(1+2j)
> That is a good point, but subclassing isn't the only w
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Roger Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
sub foo { want.List ?? (1,2,3) :: 1 } # or some such
This information could also be attached to @ARGS. E.g.
@ARGS."return_list"(1)
Would it be possible to attach it to the continuation? Then in the
course of
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #34661]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34661 >
Tripped over this while implementing unicode support for Tcl:
.sub main @MAIN
$S0 = u
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #34660]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34660 >
In my test bed, I've switched tcl over to using unicode for most of its
strings, so tha
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #34659]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34659 >
In my test bed, I've switched tcl over to using unicode for most of its
strings, so tha
Ron Blaschke wrote:
> mmd failure is new, test 18 fails with the following message.
> t\pmc\mmdNOK 18# got: 'Method '__add' not found
[snip]
Forget about this, Leo just fixed it.
Ron
Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t\dynclass\foo.t 1 256 11 100.00% 1
t\dynclass\gdbmhash.t13 332813 13 100.00% 1-13
t\dynclass\pybuiltin.t6 1536
Roger Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > sub foo { want.List ?? (1,2,3) :: 1 } # or some such
> >
> > This information could also be attached to @ARGS. E.g.
> >
> > @ARGS."return_list"(1)
> Would it be possible to attach it to the continuation? Then in the
> cours
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Parrot currently doesn't compile on Windows, b/c of the following in
>> F.
>> const MMD_init _temp_mmd_init[] = {
>> };
> Thanks, fixed.
Great, thanks!
>> There's gotta be at least one element in the array. Not sure why
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Parrot currently doesn't compile on Windows, b/c of the following in
> F.
> const MMD_init _temp_mmd_init[] = {
> };
Thanks, fixed.
> There's gotta be at least one element in the array. Not sure why this
> compiles on other platforms, though.
On Sunday 03 April 2005 14:06, Ron Blaschke wrote:
> I'd reckon once C<--without-icu> is in place, one should be able to
> run
>
> $rm -rf icu
> $perl Configure --without-icu --nomanicheck
>
> So it shouldn't really matter when exactly F is removed.
Hmm, okay. Thats indeed true.
I've attac
Jens Rieks wrote:
> On Sunday 03 April 2005 10:06, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Jens Rieks wrote:
[snip]
>> then we verify that we can build with a system ICU or without. Then we
>> can move over to SVN and procede with step 4).
> Why don't we remove the support for the bundled ICU prior to the move?
On Sunday 03 April 2005 10:06, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jens Rieks wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 March 2005 12:01, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >>4) Makefile cleanups to remove in-tree icu build stuff
> >
> > Patch ready. When should I commit it?
>
> This was the 4th step in the plan. First we need:
>
> 1)
Parrot currently doesn't compile on Windows, b/c of the following in
F.
const MMD_init _temp_mmd_init[] = {
};
error C2059: syntax error : '}'
There's gotta be at least one element in the array. Not sure why this
compiles on other platforms, though.
Ron
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Below inline attached is a scheme for an abstraction layer around
calling conventions.
Comments welcome,
leo
> 2.5) return context
>
> Yesterdays conversation on IRC (yes!) has clearly shown that the
> current calling conventions are lacking information about scalar vs
> li
Jens Rieks wrote:
On Thursday 31 March 2005 12:01, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
4) Makefile cleanups to remove in-tree icu build stuff
Patch ready. When should I commit it?
This was the 4th step in the plan. First we need:
1) patches are very welcome that
$ perl Configure.pl --without-icu
then we verif
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Or even:
>> nmake win32-installer
>> ?
>> The Windows equivalent of "rpm" would be "msi".
> Maybe then:
> nmake win32-inno-installer
> nmake win32-msi-installer
> ...
> (which make the win32 prefix rather superfluent)
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
