Hello,
I am writing an XSLT 2.0 processor, and I want to give users the
option to write their own message and error handling routines and the
like in their favourite scripting language. So I thought of using
parrot.
But when I look at http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/embed.html, I can
see no way of
you'll probably want to use the Parrot_call_sub_* API to call individual
subroutines and get return values. "perldoc extend.c" in the parrot
source for more info. you might also have a look at the mod_parrot source
(http://www.smashing.org/mod_parrot), which is one of the few apps
embedding parro
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:00:14PM +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> But when I look at http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/embed.html, I can
> see no way of getting information back from the script - not even an
> exit code. Is there anyway of doing this that I have missed?
You may wish to use Parrot_c
Adrian Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Leo,
> OK, you've confused me now :-) You're getting the same results as me
> (which I also get with the latest parrot, shown below).
I had missed that Parrot is run anyway.
Should be fixed now as of Parrot rev 8110.
leo
> "Jeff" == Jeff Horwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> you'll probably want to use the Parrot_call_sub_* API to
Jeff> call individual subroutines and get return values. "perldoc
Jeff> extend.c" in the parrot source for more info. you might
Thanks - I'll take a look at that.
On 17 May 2005, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> Jeff> also have a look at the mod_parrot source
> Jeff> (http://www.smashing.org/mod_parrot), which is one of the
> Jeff> few apps embedding parrot at the moment. the other is pugs
> Jeff> (http://www.pugscode.org), but it's written in has
On Friday 13 May 2005 18:55, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> Juergen Boemmels schrieb:
> >Hello,
> >
> >In the current SVN repository are 76 .cvsignore files. In SVN they aren't
> > used any more. SVN uses the property 'svn:ignore' on a directory instead.
> >
> >During the cvs => svn transition the s
> "Autrijus" == Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Autrijus> You may wish to use Parrot_call_sub's "SS" form, where
Autrijus> you pass in a string and get back a string.
I take it SS stands for String-to-String?
Which section within http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/ covers this
> "Jeff" == Jeff Horwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Why's that a but? Haskell's a good language.
Jeff> no argument there -- just assumed you were looking for
Jeff> examples in C! :)
Actually, examples in any language are fine.
I'm actually writing in Eiffel, but I shall use
On 17 May 2005, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> Actually, examples in any language are fine.
> I'm actually writing in Eiffel, but I shall use an interface generator
> to automatically build low-level bridging classes from the C header
> files.
> I intend to make it available as a general extension mech
> [bernhard - Mo 16. Mai. 2005, 02:42:49]:
>
> > i. Migrate the changes in .cvsignore file into the svn:ignore property
> Done.
> > ii. Tell manicheck.pl to query the SVN properties
t/src/manifest.t verifies that MANIFEST.SKIP is consistent with the
svn:ignore properties.
This make manicheck.pl
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:31:32PM +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> I take it SS stands for String-to-String?
Yes. "PPC" would stand for PMC -> PMC -> String, i.e. take two PMCs
and returns a String.
> Which section within http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/ covers this sort
> of thing?
`perldoc ex
On 5/17/05, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:31:32PM +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> > I take it SS stands for String-to-String?
>
> Yes. "PPC" would stand for PMC -> PMC -> String, i.e. take two PMCs
> and returns a String.
>
of course, you meant PPS here,
parrot (r8016): no change. hangs w/98% cpu. here's the -t output:
parrot -t test_b.pasm
0 find_global P5, "_foo" - P5=SArray=PMC(0x7d5a50),
3 new P2, 18 - P2=PMCNULL,
6 find_method P0, P2, "thread3"- P0=PMCNULL,
P2=ParrotThread=PMC(0x7d5a08),
10 new P6, 54 - P6=PMCN
I'm seeing the following test failure at r8113
t/src/manifestNOK 6# Failed test (t/src/manifest.t at line 79)
# Extra files:
# dynclasses/build.pl
# editor/imc.vim
# install_config.fpmc
# t/src/.manifest.t.swp
# test.imc
# test.pbc
# Looks like you faile
Dino Morelli wrote:
I'm seeing the following test failure at r8113
t/src/manifestNOK 6# Failed test (t/src/manifest.t at line 79)
I'd say we just drop this test. Whenever you do reasoanble work in the
working tree, you got test files, editor swap file and whatnot.
leo
Vladimir Lipsky wrote:
parrot (r8016): no change. hangs w/98% cpu. here's the -t output:
As stated already, this (and possibly other thread) test(s) can't
succeed as long as Win32 has no event loop that passes the terminate
event on to the running interpreter.
The last two pmc's are allocated fr
17 matches
Mail list logo
