[PATCH]PackFile_destroy fix

2005-05-29 Thread Vladimir Lipsky
Nested packfile segments of type directory are freed twice by default_destroy(). The first time it happens in directory_destroy(), and the second time in PackFile_Segment_destroy(). This behavior is, of course, incorrect, the patch fixes it. packfile.c.patch Description: Binary data

[PATCH]Parrot_dod_sweep fix

2005-05-29 Thread Vladimir Lipsky
This patch prevents from an attempt to add a NULL PMC_EXT structure to the pmc ext pool while in dod sweep run. dod.c.patch Description: Binary data

[PATCH] Improve loadlib handling of absolute and partial pathnames

2005-05-29 Thread Bob Rogers
The problem is that if you do loadlib "/home/rogers/foo/bar/baz" Parrot_load_lib finds and loads "/home/rogers/foo/bar/baz.so" just fine, but then the library isn't initialized properly because it attempts to look up the address of "Parrot_lib_/home/rogers/foo/bar/baz_load" via dlsym,

TclLists <-> TclStrings

2005-05-29 Thread Will Coleda
Tcl has a need to be able to convert between Lists and Strings. All of the morphing samples that are in, say, PerlUndef are for scalars. Right now, I have a PIR method, "_Tcl::__stringToList" that takes a string, and then uses the tcl parser to split it up into a list. What I'd like to do i

Re: [perl #36026] [PATCH]Modified Strength Reduction Redux

2005-05-29 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Curtis Rawls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The first patch (optimizer.patch) does > cleanup/refactoring/improvements to the strength_reduce() function in > optimizer.c . Thanks, applied - 8203 NB: some more come to my mind: add I0, 1 => inc I0 add N0, 1.0 => inc N0 sub I0, 1 => dec I0

[perl #36026] [PATCH]Modified Strength Reduction Redux

2005-05-29 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Curtis Rawls # Please include the string: [perl #36026] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36026 > The first patch (optimizer.patch) does cleanup/refactoring/improvements to the strength

Re: [PATCH]class_count_mutex

2005-05-29 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Vladimir Lipsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > class_count_mutex is used without having been initialized. The fixes that. Thanks, applied - r8198 leo