Nattfodd wrote:
>It's here :
>http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/alexandre.buisse/divers/gmc_for_dummies.pod
>A more complete document is http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/divers/gmc_design.pod
>
>
Sorry, the second URL is actually
http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/alexandre.buisse/divers/gmc_design.pod
"jerry gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any input on why we have the tests right shift by 8 bits what spwanw
gives
them back would be helpful. If its that the exit code on a UNIXy platform
is
in the upper byte, then surely it's better to right shift it in the
platform
specific stuff (in platfor
Hi,
I've produced a new document on GMC (Generational Mark & Compact), the
GC I'm trying to implement as a Summer of Code project. It's called gmc
for dummies and I hope it's plainly understandable (if not, tell me so
and I'll try to make it better). It should explain how things will
hopefully work
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 08:27 -0700, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> After running 'make test', Parrot leaves the following files lying around
> in /tmp. I think there's from t/perl/Parrot_Docs.t.
> There are two problems:
> 1. Parrot should clean up after itself.
> 2. Parrot should probably pic
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #36567]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36567 >
After running 'make test', Parrot leaves the following files lying around
in /tmp. I
On 7/15/05, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch implements a missing function in config\gen\win32\exec.c to make
> all of the tests in t\op\spawnw.t work.
>
excellent!
> Any input on why we have the tests right shift by 8 bits what spwanw gives
> them back would
Hi,
This patch implements a missing function in config\gen\win32\exec.c to make
all of the tests in t\op\spawnw.t work.
Any input on why we have the tests right shift by 8 bits what spwanw gives
them back would be helpful. If its that the exit code on a UNIXy platform is
in the upper byte, t
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 12:29:29AM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
Ah, there we go. partcl is back down to about 4.5 times slower.
Running a trace, I see the top two opcodes are:
Code J Name Calls Total/s Avg/ms
177 - compile_p_p_s
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 12:29:29AM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
> Ah, there we go. partcl is back down to about 4.5 times slower.
> Running a trace, I see the top two opcodes are:
>
> Code J Name Calls Total/s Avg/ms
> 177 - compile_p_p_s20.
On Jul 14, 2005, at 12:51, Will Coleda wrote:
http://dev.perl.org/perl6/people.html
Perhaps we need a similar page on parrotcode. =-)
Seems unnecessary to maintain it in two locations, but you could link
to that one from parrotcode.org.
Ok. Does parrot/perl6 have a project planning tool?
10 matches
Mail list logo
